549 Views
82 Downloads |
Bridging the gap: socioeconomic inequalities in the use of formal and informal home care
Maja Matanić Vautmans*
Article | Year: 2026 | Pages: 241 - 257 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 2 Received: June 1, 2025 | Accepted: December 15, 2025 | Published online: June 5, 2026
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
|
Person
|
Health status
|
Number of
visits by a formal caregiver
|
|
|
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
1
|
Good
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
|
2
|
Good
|
10
|
5
|
10
|
5
|
|
3
|
Bad
|
5
|
10
|
15
|
5
|
|
4
|
Bad
|
10
|
10
|
20
|
5
|
|
HI*
|
|
Inequality
|
Equality
|
Inequality
|
Equality
|
|
VI**
|
|
Inequity
|
Equity
|
Equity
|
Inequity
|
Note: HI* shows horizontal (in)equality2 VI** shows vertical (in)equity. Source: Author based on Vallejo-Torres (2013).
|
Independent variables
|
Explanations
|
|
Age
|
It is assumed that older people will be more
likely to use formal care since they often live alone (without a spouse or
children in their immediate environment), and their health condition becomes
increasingly complicated with age, requiring professional care. Age is a
quantitative variable that measures the age of the respondents3 at
the time of the survey.
|
|
Gender
|
Women are more likely to be widowed. With a
longer life expectancy and having cared for their spouses throughout their
lives, they themselves become dependent on other people's help. Since the
complexity of health conditions increases with age, it is assumed that they will
use formal care. Gender is a binary variable, indicating whether the
respondent is female.
|
|
Education
|
Higher levels of education are associated with
greater access to information, higher income, and a tendency to choose formal
care. Education is a quantitative variable that measures the total number of
years of formal education completed by respondents.
|
|
Income
|
Higher income provides greater opportunities and
greater use of formal care. Household income is determined by the total
average income of all family members. As income has an asymmetric
distribution with most respondents having lower values and a smaller number
of respondents having high and very high values, the variable will be
transformed by its natural logarithm before inclusion in the analyses. This
quantitative variable in the paper is marked as Income.
|
|
Marital status
|
Married people are more likely to choose informal
care, as one of the spouses can take on the role of informal caregiver. The
marital status variable is a binary variable, where the first category
includes the original categories: “never married”, “divorced”,
“widows/widowers”; and the second categories: “married, living with spouse”,
“registered partnership” and “married, not living with spouse”.
|
|
Children
|
People living in families with children are more
likely to use informal care than people without children. The children
variable is a quantitative variable of the number of children of the
respondents.
|
|
Area
|
Area is a binary variable of the place where the
respondents live, where the original variable had 5 categories that were
combined into two: urban and rural.
|
|
Health status
|
Based on the person's own assessment (self-perceived
health with a scale from 1 – excellent to 5 – poor and given that it takes on
5 different values with an approximately symmetrical distribution, this is
used in the analyses as a quantitative variable with numerical values from 1
to 5.
|
|
Chronic diseases
|
Health conditions that last longer than 3 months.
Chronic conditions records the number of chronic conditions that the
respondent lives with and is also treated as a quantitative variable.
|
|
ADL
|
Activities of daily living limitations (ADL) refers
to six parameters using the Katz index to record a person's state of health
and refers to: 1. walking across the room; 2. dressing; 3. bathing or
showering; 4. dining; 5. getting on/off the bed; 6. use of the toilet. ADL
was measured on scale from 0 to 6.
|
|
IADL
|
Instrumental activities of daily living limitations
(IADL) refers to 8 parameters using the Lawtaon index to assess independent
functioning in daily life. They relate to 1. preparing meals; 2. shopping for
groceries; 3. making telephone calls; 4. taking medications; 5. managing
finances; 6. using transportation; 7. household activities; and 8. dressing
and doing laundry. IADL is measured on a scale from 0 to 9 (laundry is a
separate category 9).
|
Source: Author.
Table 1Display of horizontal (in)equality and vertical (in)equity in the use of LTC services defined by the number of visits of professional caregivers (formal type of care) DISPLAY Table
Table 2Explanations of independent variables that are used in the examination of inequality and inequity in home care DISPLAY Table
* The author is grateful to two anonymous referees who have contributed to the quality of the final version of the paper.
1 Inequality = what exists (health, age, gender). Inequity = what is unfair or unjustified, adjusting for need (income, education, living environment, etc.).
2 Inequality = what exists (health, age, gender). These factors are unchangeable. Inequity = what is unfair or unjustified, adjusting for need factors (income, education, living environment, etc.). This can be changed based on life circumstances.
3 Respondent is the person who is receiving the care (not the informal carer).
4 Descriptive statistics are available upon request.
5 Graphical representations for the concentration indexes (CI) of current care utilization, horizontal, vertical, and total inequality, contributions of individual factors to the concentration indexes, diagrams of elasticity and partial concentration indexes (CI) and contributions of the necessity factor to vertical inequity available upon request for the countries Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Greece, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland and the Czech Republic.
|
|
June, 2026 II/2026
|