1937 Views
113 Downloads |
Climate finance, institutions and innovation systems in Sub-Saharan Africa
Frank Adu*
Roshelle Ramfol*
Roshelle Ramfol
Affiliation: College of Accounting Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
0000-0002-4682-2558
Article | Year: 2025 | Pages: 309 - 337 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 2 Received: October 9, 2024 | Accepted: February 20, 2025 | Published online: June 7, 2025
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
|
Variable
|
Notation
|
Measurement
|
Source
|
|
Dependent variable
|
|
Innovation
|
INNOV
|
Innovation output
sub-index (score 0–100)
|
WIPO
|
|
Independent variable
|
|
Climate finance
|
CF
|
Climate-related development finance Commitment (Current
USD thousand)
|
OECD
|
|
Mediating variable
|
|
Institutional
quality index
|
IQ
|
It is computed as an average of Kaufmann’s six indicators
of institutional quality (Regulatory quality, government effectiveness, rule of
law, control of corruption, voice and accountability, political stability, and
lack of violence)
|
WDI
|
|
Control variables
|
|
Human capital
|
HC
|
School enrolment, tertiary (% gross)
|
WDI
|
|
GDP per capita
|
GDPPC
|
GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$)
|
WDI
|
|
Government expenditure
|
GE
|
General government
final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)
|
WDI
|
|
Digital infrastructure
|
DIFRA
|
Mobile cellular
subscriptions (per 100 people), Individuals using the Internet (% of the population),
Fixed telephone subscriptions (per 100 people) and Fixed broadband subscriptions
(per 100 people)
|
WDI
|
|
Financial development
|
|
Domestic credit
to private sector (% of GDP)
|
WDI
|
Note: WIPO, OECD and WDI represent the World Intellectual Property Organization, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and World Governance Indicators, respectively. Source: Authors.
|
Variable
|
Obs.
|
Mean
|
Std. dev.
|
Min.
|
Max.
|
Measurement unit
|
|
INNO
|
276
|
22.152
|
12.735
|
0.300
|
71.800
|
Index score 0–100
|
|
CF
|
275
|
43.724
|
33.943
|
11.000
|
209.102
|
Current USD thousand
|
|
IQ
|
276
|
0.502
|
0.310
|
0.000
|
1.000
|
Index score 0-1
|
|
GDPPC
|
276
|
5,669.880
|
17,113.00
|
262.185
|
90,057.03
|
US$
|
|
HC
|
276
|
89.880
|
72.415
|
1.000
|
222
|
%
|
|
IFRAI
|
276
|
0.525
|
0.236
|
0.000
|
0.992
|
Index score 0-1
|
|
GE
|
276
|
15.233
|
5.837
|
6.697
|
36.143
|
%
|
|
FD
|
276
|
26.672
|
27.283
|
0.000
|
128.838
|
%
|
Note: INNOV, CF, IQ, GDPPC, HC, IFRAD, GE and FD indicate innovation, climate finance, institutional quality index, gross domestic product per capita, human capital, infrastructure development, government expenditure and financial development. Source: Authors.
|
Variables
|
(1)
|
(2)
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
(5)
|
(6)
|
(7)
|
(8)
|
|
(1) INNO
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) CF
|
0.031
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) IQ
|
0.056
|
-0.036
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) GDPPC
|
0.696
|
0.082
|
-0.114
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) HC
|
0.283
|
0.036
|
0.029
|
0.285
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
(6) IFRAI
|
0.022
|
0.023
|
-0.101
|
0.157
|
0.168
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
(7) GE
|
-0.069
|
0.026
|
-0.060
|
-0.086
|
0.085
|
0.050
|
1.000
|
|
|
(8) FD
|
0.207
|
0.041
|
0.052
|
0.060
|
0.042
|
0.154
|
0.307
|
1.000
|
Source: Authors.
|
Variable
|
CD test
|
Prob. value
|
|
INNOV
|
16.921
|
0.000
|
|
CF
|
9.680
|
0.000
|
|
IQ
|
2.348
|
0.019
|
|
GDPPC
|
21.806
|
0.000
|
|
HC
|
4.205
|
0.000
|
|
INFRAI
|
11.204
|
0.000
|
|
GE
|
2.088
|
0.037
|
|
FD
|
8.552
|
0.000
|
Note: The null hypothesis is that errors are weakly cross-sectionally dependent and the alternative
hypothesis is that errors are strongly cross-sectionally dependent.Source: Authors.
|
|
CIPS test
|
CADF test
|
|
Variable
|
I(0)
|
I(1)
|
I(0)
|
I(1)
|
|
INNOV
|
-1.771
|
-2.692***
|
-1.012
|
-2.610***
|
|
CF
|
-2.455**
|
-6.279***
|
-1.925*
|
-2.273**
|
|
IQ
|
-2.311**
|
-3.044***
|
-1.954*
|
-2.740***
|
|
GDPPC
|
-1.545
|
-2.267**
|
-2.081**
|
-2.610***
|
|
HC
|
-1.493
|
-2.938**
|
-0.992
|
-2.610***
|
|
INFRAI
|
-2.645***
|
-4.061***
|
-2.034**
|
-2.475***
|
|
GE
|
-2.129*
|
-3.533***
|
-1.450
|
-2.394***
|
|
FD
|
-0.885
|
-2.180**
|
-0.702
|
-2.611***
|
Note: ***, ** and * represent significant at 1%, 5% and 10% significance level. *, **, *** represent
stationarity. Source: Authors.
|
Variable
|
Coefficient
|
|
System-GMM
|
Difference GMM
|
|
lnINNOVt-1
|
-0.306***
(0.069)
|
-0.184*
(0.108)
|
|
lnCF
|
-1.003***
(0.376)
|
-0.438**
(0.227)
|
|
IQ
|
3.039**
(1.334)
|
1.430*
(0.775)
|
|
lnCF_IQ
|
2.074**
(0.757)
|
0.974*
(0.580)
|
|
lnGDPPC
|
-0.980
(1.339)
|
1.413
(4.054)
|
|
HC
|
0.011**
(0.004)
|
0.003
(0.005)
|
|
IFRAD
|
-1.874*
(1.084)
|
-0.918
(1.039)
|
|
lnGE
|
-10.193**
(4.511)
|
-1.441
(2.577)
|
|
lnFD
|
5.289
(3.899)
|
0.847
(3.372)
|
|
Net/marginal effect
|
3.039**
(1.3339)
|
1.430*
(0.775)
|
|
Constant
|
19.887
(12.593)
|
|
|
AR(2) test statistic
|
-0.67
|
-0.88
|
|
AR(2) P-value
|
0.505
|
0.377
|
|
Hansen test statistic
|
4.94
|
5.89
|
|
Hansen P-value
|
0.895
|
0.751
|
|
No. groups
|
22
|
22
|
|
No. instruments
|
20
|
20
|
Note: ***, ** and * represent significant at 1%, 5% and 10% significance level. Source: Authors.
|
Percentile
|
Percentile values
|
System-GMM
|
Difference GMM
|
|
10
|
0.0212
|
-0.959**
(0.361)
|
-0.418
(0.316)
|
|
25
|
0.2612
|
-0.461**
(0.216)
|
-0.184
(0.184)
|
|
50
|
0.509
|
0.053
(0.172)
|
0.058
(0.084)
|
|
75
|
0.762
|
0.577*
(0.291)
|
0.304**
(0.148)
|
|
90
|
0.922
|
0.910**
(0.397)
|
0.460**
(0.232)
|
Note: ** and * represent significance at 5% and 10%, respectively. Source: Authors.
|
Variables
|
W-bar-Stat.
|
Z-bar-Stat.
|
Prob. value
|
Conclusion
|
|
INNO ˃ CF
|
2.758
|
1.818
|
0.069*
|
↔
|
|
CF ˃ INNOV
|
3.836
|
4.403
|
0.000***
|
|
INNO ˃ IQ
|
7.047
|
12.102
|
0.000***
|
↔
|
|
IQ ˃ INNOV
|
4.472
|
5.927
|
0.000***
|
|
CF ˃ IQ
|
3.366
|
3.275
|
0.001***
|
↔
|
|
IQ ˃ CF
|
5.222
|
7.725
|
0.000***
|
Note: *** and * denote significance at 1% and 10% levels, respectively; > denotes the direction of causality; ↔ signifies a bidirectional causality, and → denotes a one-way causality. Source: Authors.
|
|
Coefficient
|
|
Variable
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 3
|
|
lnINNOVt-1
|
-0.253***
(0.059)
|
-0.273***
(0.081)
|
-0.005
(0.012)
|
|
SQCF
|
-1.439*
(0.694)
|
|
|
|
IQ
|
1.435**
(0.608)
|
|
1.541**
(0.681)
|
|
lnCF
|
|
-1.099*
(0.570)
|
-0.052
(0.749)
|
|
SQIQ
|
|
3.463*
(1.871)
|
|
|
lnCF_IQ
|
0.805*
(0.454)
|
2.2529**
(1.078)
|
|
|
SQCF_SQIQ
|
|
|
-3.085**
(1.095)
|
|
lnGDPPC
|
-1.383
(1.549)
|
-1.369
(1.212)
|
2.241**
(0.788)
|
|
HC
|
0.010
(0.005)
|
0.015**
(0.004)
|
0.005
(0.005)
|
|
IFRAD
|
-1.464
(1.167)
|
-0.889
(1.385)
|
0.046
(0.439)
|
|
lnGE
|
-9.912*
(4.972)
|
-11.830**
(4.987)
|
6.330***
(2.126)
|
|
lnFD
|
6.869*
(3.368)
|
5.634
(3.454)
|
-7.057***
(1.295)
|
|
Net/marginal effect
|
1.435**
(0.608)
|
3.463*
(1.871)
|
|
|
Constant
|
18.732
(16.225)
|
25.500
(17.185)
|
-8.477
(7.984)
|
|
AR(2) test statistic
|
-1.06
|
-0.61
|
0.20
|
|
AR(2) P-value
|
0.290
|
0.545
|
0.845
|
|
Hansen test statistic
|
6.88
|
5.56
|
10.34
|
|
Hansen P-value
|
0.737
|
0.724
|
0.500
|
|
No. groups
|
22
|
22
|
22
|
|
No. instruments
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
vv
|
Variable
|
Coefficient
|
|
Model 1 (Corruption)
|
Model 2 (Political stability)
|
|
lnINNOVt-1
|
-0.0224***
(0.0077)
|
-0.0282***
(0.0082)
|
|
lnCF
|
0.2341*
(0.1299)
|
0.2872*
(0.1648)
|
|
IQ
|
0.9704
(1.4483)
|
12.7816***
(4.0337)
|
|
lnCF_IQ
|
0.3464*
(0.1786)
|
0.0278
(0.9146)
|
|
lnGDPPC
|
-2.4345
(1.5679)
|
-3.2546
(1.6244)
|
|
HC
|
-0.0007
(0.0045)
|
0.0045
(0.0029)
|
|
IFRAD
|
0.9363
(0.8260)
|
1.2717**
(0.5709)
|
|
lnGE
|
-6.5124
(3.8685)
|
-6.6579*
(3.7287)
|
|
lnFD
|
0.5256
(1.5001)
|
2.9371
(2.0951)
|
|
Constant
|
35.6356**
(17.7762)
|
36.4524**
(17.1689)
|
|
AR(2) Test statistic
|
-0.91
|
-0.88
|
|
AR(2) P-value
|
0.362
|
0.379
|
|
Hansen test statistic
|
6.43
|
7.04
|
|
Hansen P-value
|
0.696
|
0.633
|
|
No. groups
|
22
|
22
|
|
No. instruments
|
19
|
19
|
Figure 1Trend analysis of climate finance among SSA countries DISPLAY Figure
Table 1Variable description DISPLAY Table
Table 2Descriptive statistics DISPLAY Table
Figure 2Scatter plot between climate finance, institutional quality and innovation in SSA DISPLAY Figure
Table 3Pairwise correlation among the variables DISPLAY Table
Table 4Weakly cross-sectional dependency test DISPLAY Table
Table 5Unit root test results DISPLAY Table
Table 6Effect of climate finance and institutional quality on innovation in SSA DISPLAY Table
Table 7Marginal effect of climate finance on innovation DISPLAY Table
Table 8Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality test results DISPLAY Table
Table A1Effect of climate finance and institutional quality on innovation in SSA (non-linear system-GMM results) DISPLAY Table
Table A2Effect of climate finance and institutional quality on innovation in SSA (system-GMM results) DISPLAY Table
* The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.
|
|
June, 2025 II/2025
|