Public Sector Economics

843
Views



284
Downloads

Could the decrease in Belgian government debt-servicing costs offset increased age-related expenditure?



Mikkel Barslund*
   
Lars Ludolph*
Article   |   Year:  2019   |   Pages:  225 - 246   |   Volume:  43   |   Issue:  3
Received:  July 12, 2018   |   Accepted:  July 23, 2019   |   Published online:  September 14, 2019
Download citation        https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.43.3.1       


  1. Alcidi, C. [et al.], 2015. Currency Interventions: Effective Policy Tool or Shortsighted Gamble? Intereconomics, 50(2), pp. 64-81 [CrossRef]

  2. Alesina, A. [et al.], 1992. Default Risk on Government Debt in OECD Countries. Economic Policy, 7(5), pp. 427-463 [CrossRef]

  3. Barsky, R., Justiniano, A. and Melosi, L., 2014. The Natural Rate of Interest and Its Usefulness for Monetary Policy. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 104(5), pp. 37–43 [CrossRef]

  4. Bean, C. [et al.], 2015. Low for long? Causes and consequences of persistently low interest rates. London: CEPR Press.

  5. Blanchard, O. J. and Missale, A., 1991. The debt burden and debt maturity. NBER Working Paper, No. 3944. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  6. Borio, C. [et al.], 2017. Why so low for so long? A long-term view of real interest rates. BIS Working Paper, No. 685.

  7. Börsch-Supan, A., 2003. Life-Cycle Savings and Public Policy: A Cross-National Study of Six Countries. San Diego, CA: Academic Press [CrossRef]

  8. Breedon, F., Chadha, J. S. and Waters, A., 2012. The financial market impact of UK quantitative easing. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(4), pp. 702-728 [CrossRef]

  9. Brumberg, R. and Modigliani, F., 1954. Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-Section Data. In: K. Kurihara, ed. Post Keynesian Economics. New Brunswick, CT: Rutgers University Press.

  10. Carvalho, C., Ferrero, A. and Nechio, F., 2016. Demographics and Real Interest Rates: Inspecting the Mechanism. European Economic Review, 88, pp. 208-226 [CrossRef]

  11. Case, K. E., Quigley, J. M. and Shiller, R. J., 2005. Comparing wealth effects: the stock market versus the housing market. BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 5(1), pp. 1-34 [CrossRef]

  12. Credit Suisse, 2016. HOLT Macro Insights – March 2016. Credit Suisse Market Commentary.

  13. Cúrdia, V. [et al.], 2015. Has US monetary policy tracked the efficient interest rate? Journal of Monetary Economics, 70, pp. 72-83 [CrossRef]

  14. Dynan, K. E., Skinner, J. and Zeldes, S. P., 2004. Do the Rich save more? Journal of Political Economy, 112(2), pp. 397-444 [CrossRef]

  15. Eggertsson, G. B., Mehrotra, N. R. and Robbins, J. A., 2017. A Model of Secular Stagnation: Theory and Quantitative Evaluation. NBER Working Paper, No. 23093 [CrossRef]

  16. Elmendorf, D. W. and Sheiner, L. M., 2017. Federal budget policy with an aging population and persistently low interest rates. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), pp. 175-194 [CrossRef]


  17. European Commission, 2016. Country Report Belgium 2016. Commission Staff Working Document, No. 26.


  18. Gros, D., 2016. QE infinity: What risks for the ECB? In-Depth Analysis, IP/A/ECON/2016-01, February.

  19. IMF, 2014a. Perspectives on global real interest rates. World Economic Outlook, Ch. 3. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

  20. IMF, 2014b. Is it time for an infrastructure push? The macroeconomic effects of public investment. World Economic Outlook, Ch. 3. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

  21. IMF, 2016a. Time Series Data on International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

  22. IMF, 2016b. Fiscal Monitor: Acting Now, Acting Together. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

  23. IMF, 2016c. Article IV consultation on Belgium. IMF Country Report, No. 16/77 [CrossRef]

  24. Jäger, P. and Schmidt, T., 2016. The political economy of public investment when population is aging: a panel cointegration analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 43, pp. 145-158 [CrossRef]

  25. Justiniano, A. and Primiceri, G. E., 2010. Measuring the equilibrium real interest rate. Economic Perspectives, pp. 14-27.

  26. Kiley, M. T., 2015. What Can the Data Tell Us About the Equilibrium Real Interest Rate? FEDS Working Paper, No. 2015-077 [CrossRef]

  27. Laubach, T. and Williams, J. C., 2015. Measuring the Natural Rate of Interest Redux. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco [CrossRef]

  28. Liu, Z. and Spiegel, M. M., 2011. Boomer retirement: headwinds for US equity markets? FRBSF Economic Letter 2011-26.

  29. Lubik, T. A. and Matthes, C., 2015. Calculating the Natural Rate of Interest: A Comparison of Two Alternative Approaches. Economic Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, October, pp. 1-6.

  30. Ma, G. and Tao Yang, D., 2013. China’s High Saving Puzzle. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 7223 [CrossRef]

  31. Ma, G. and Yi, W., 2010. China’s high saving rate: myth and reality. BIS Working Papers, No 312 [CrossRef]

  32. OECD, 2015. OECD Economic Outlook. Paris: OECD.

  33. Piketty, T., 2014. Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  34. Rachel, L. and Smith, T., 2015. Secular drivers of the global real interest rate. Bank of England Staff Working Paper, No. 571 [CrossRef]

  35. Saez, E. and Zucman, G., 2014. Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: evidence from capitalized income tax data. NBER Working Paper, No. 20625 [CrossRef]

  36. Tao Yang, D., 2012. Aggregate Savings and External Imbalances in China. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 6964.

  37. Taylor, J. B. and Wieland, V., 2016. Finding the equilibrium real interest rate in a fog of policy deviations. Business Economics, 51(3), pp. 147-154 [CrossRef]

  38. Thwaites, G., 2015. Why are real interest rates so low? Secular stagnation and the relative price of investment goods. Bank of England Staff Working Paper, No. 564 [CrossRef]

  September, 2019
III/2019
In order to give you a better user experience, cookies have been stored on your computer.
Accept cookie     More information