Institute of public finance
Public Sector Economics conference
Call for papers
LOGIN / REGISTER
CELEBRATING Celebrating 50
Public Sector Economics
CURRENT ISSUE
PAST ISSUES
ABOUT PSE
FOR AUTHORS
ETHICAL GUIDELINES
CONTACT
Print page
Search box

2671
Views



282
Downloads

COVID-19 and participatory budgeting in North Macedonia and Slovakia



Mária Murray Svidroňová*
   
Marjan Nikolov*
   
Vesna Garvanlieva Andonova*
   
Alena Kaščáková*
Article   |   Year:  2023   |   Pages:  387 - 406   |   Volume:  47   |   Issue:  3
Received:  December 1, 2022   |   Accepted:  April 11, 2023   |   Published online:  September 4, 2023
Download citation        https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.47.3.4       


  1. Abers, R., 2000. Inventing local democracy: grassroots politics in Brazil. Lynne Rienner Publishers [CrossRef]

  2. Allgozzine, B. and Hancock, D. R., 2006. Doing case study research: a practical guide for beginning researchers. New York: Teachers College Press.

  3. Amsler, L. B., 2016. Collaborative governance: Integrating management, politics, and law. Public Administration Review, 76(5), pp. 700-711 [CrossRef]

  4. Anessi-Pessina, E. [et al.], 2020. Reconsidering public budgeting after the COVID-19 outbreak: key lessons and future challenges. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(5), pp. 957-965 [CrossRef]

  5. Avritzer, L., 2006. New public spheres in Brazil: local democracy and deliberative politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), pp. 623-637 [CrossRef]

  6. Baiocchi, G., Heller, P. and Silva, M. K., 2008. Making space for civil society: institutional reforms and local democracy in Brazil. Social Forces, 86(3), pp. 911-936 [CrossRef]

  7. Balážová, M. [et al.], 2022. Determinants of combining budgetary innovations at the local level: experience from Slovakia. Public Sector Economics, 46(3), pp. 355-383 [CrossRef]

  8. Baranowski, J., 2020. Participatory budget and the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic in Poland. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 16(SI), pp. 24-37 [CrossRef]

  9. Bardovič, J. 2021. Volebný systém na Slovensku a jeho vybrané problémy v rokoch 1989-2019. In: T. Dvorský, J. Ruman and J. Šutajová, eds. 1989-2019: Dekády zmien. Kam kráčaš demokracia. Košice: Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach, pp. 63-81.

  10. Bardovič, J. and Gašparík, J., 2021. Enablers of participatory budgeting in Slovakia during the COVID19 pandemic. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 29(1) [CrossRef]

  11. Bhusal, T., 2020. Citizen participation in times of crisis: Understanding participatory budget during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nepal. ASEAN Journal of Community Engagement, 4(2), pp. 321-341 [CrossRef]

  12. Boc, E. and Lazăr, D. T., 2022. Participatory Budgeting in Romania. In: M. S. De Vries, J. Nemec and D. Špaček, eds. International Trends in Participatory Budgeting. Palgrave Cham: Macmillan, pp. 187-204 [CrossRef]

  13. Buček, J., 2022. Local Self-Government and Governance During Covid-19 Pandemic in Slovakia. Local Government and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cham: Springer, pp. 481-505 [CrossRef]

  14. Burkšienė, V., Burbulytė-Tsiskarishvili, G. and Dvorak, J., 2022. Mayoral influence on participatory budgeting in Lithuania during Covid-19. Emerging science journal: COVID-19: Emerging Research, 6 (spec. iss.), pp. 151-164 [CrossRef]

  15. Chevallier, M. 2009. Internet voting, Turnout and deliberation: A Study. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 7(1), pp. 71-86.

  16. Cho, C. H., Jérôme, T. and Maurice, J., 2020. “Whatever it takes”: first budgetary responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(1), pp. 12-23 [CrossRef]

  17. Cohen, S., Mamakou, X. J. and Karatzimas, S., 2017. IT-enhanced popular reports: Analyzing citizen preferences. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), pp. 283-295 [CrossRef]

  18. Craig, G. [et al.], 2005. The paradox of compacts: Monitoring the impact of compacts. London: Home Office.

  19. De Vries, M., Nemec, J. and Špaček, D., 2022. International Trends in Participatory Budgeting. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan [CrossRef]

  20. Della Porta, D., 2008. Comparative analysis: case-oriented versus variable-oriented research. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 198-222 [CrossRef]


  22. Džinić, J., Murray Svidroňová, M. and Markowska-Bzducha, E. 2016. Participatory budgeting: a comparative study of Croatia, Poland and Slovakia. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Public Policy, 9(1), pp.31-56 [CrossRef]

  23. Garvanlieva Andonova, V., Nikolov, M. and Petrovska, A. M., 2020. Municipalities and COVID-19 in North Macedonia: The implications on the public finances of the municipalities. Center for Economic Analyses (CEA).

  24. Government of the Republic of North Macedonia, 2020. Decrees with legal force to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

  25. Hadzi-Vasileva, K. [et al.], 2017. 11 Step Manual Forum in the Community. ZELS.

  26. Juza, M., 2019. After Late Modernity: Possible Scenarios for Future Social Changes. Studia Humanistyczne AGH, 18(3), pp.7-22 [CrossRef]

  27. Klimovský, D. and Hrabinová, A., 2021. The Introduction of the Charter of Good Participatory Budgeting in Slovakia: The Insiders' Story. Politické vedy, 24(4), pp. 198-202 [CrossRef]

  28. Klimovský, D. and Nemec, J., 2021. Local self-government in Slovakia. In: B. Brezovnik, I. Hoffman and J. Kostrubiec, eds. Local self-government in Europe, pp. 355-382.

  29. Klimovský, D., Nemec, J. and Bouckaert, G., 2021. The COVID-19 Pandemic in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 29(1), 1320 [CrossRef]

  30. Krenjova, J. and Raudla, R., 2013. Participatory Budgeting at the Local Level: Challenges and Opportunities for New Democracies. Halduskultuur, 14(1), pp. 18-46.

  31. Kukučková, S. and Poláchová, M., 2021. The Impact of the D21 Method and Its Modification on Citizens’ Participation in Participatory Budgeting. The Case of the Czech Republic. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, 21(2), pp. 117-138 [CrossRef]



  34. Maciel, L. R., Costa, C. S. and Catapan, A., 2022. Participatory budgeting in COVID-19 times: a perspective from Paraná and Portuguese municipalities. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(1), pp. 1-21.

  35. Manes-Rossi, F. [et al.], 2021. Features and drivers of citizen participation: Insights from participatory budgeting in three European cities. Public Management Review, 25(2), pp. 201-223 [CrossRef]

  36. Manes-Rossi, F., Aversano, N. and Tartaglia Polcini, P., 2020. Popular reporting: learning from the US experience. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(1), pp. 92-113 [CrossRef]

  37. Mikuš, D., Brix, R. and Šmatlánek, D., 2021. Specifications of Participatory Budgeting in Visegrad Group States and Possible Implementations for Slovakia. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, 21(2), pp.161-185 [CrossRef]

  38. Mikušová Meričková, B. M., Nemec, J. and Svidroňová, M., 2015. Co-creation in local public services delivery innovation: Slovak experience. Lex Localis, 13(3), pp. 521-535 [CrossRef]

  39. Murray Svidroňová, M. and Klimovský, D., 2022. Participatory Budgeting in Slovakia: Recent Development, Present State, and Interesting Cases. In: M. S. De Vries, J. Nemec and D. Špaček, eds. International Trends in Participatory Budgeting. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 247-269 [CrossRef]

  40. Popławski, M., 2020. COVID-19 and Direct Contact-Free Democracy-Experiences from Poland. Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, 6(58), pp. 603-614 [CrossRef]

  41. Sintomer, Y. [et al.], 2013. Participatory budgeting worldwide. Dialog Global, (25), pp. 1-93.

  42. Špaček, D., 2017. Social media usage and performance: the case of Czech regions. In: 25th NISPAcee Annual Conference, 18th – 20th May 2017, Kazan, Russia.

  43. Vitálišová, K. [et al.], 2017. Verejná politika a úloha občana v nej. Banská Bystrica: Belianum.

  44. Yang, K. and Pandey, S. K., 2011. Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes? Public administration review, 71(6), pp. 880-892 [CrossRef]

  45. Yin, R. K., 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. Thusand Oaks, SAGE Publications Inc.

  46. Zepic, R., Dapp, M. and Krcmar, H. 2017. Reasons for low participation in German participatory budgeting: A public administration perspective. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Digital Government. Lisbon: Academic Conferences Limited, pp. 262-269.

   September, 2023
III/2023
In order to give you a better user experience, cookies have been stored on your computer.
Accept cookie     More information