3032
Views
543
Downloads |
Determinants of combining budgetary innovations at the local level: experience from Slovakia
Martina Balážová* 
Daniel Klimovský*
Daniel Klimovský
Affiliation: Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Arts, Bratislava, Slovakia; University of Pardubice, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Science and Research Centre, Pardubice, Czech Republic
 0000-0002-0312-2842
Mária Murray Svidroňová*
Mária Murray Svidroňová
Affiliation: Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Economics, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
0000-0002-4414-479X
Juraj Nemec*
Juraj Nemec
Affiliation: Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Economics, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia; Masaryk University in Brno, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Brno, Czech Republic
0000-0002-5881-7422
Article | Year: 2022 | Pages: 355 - 383 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 3 Received: November 10, 2021 | Accepted: January 10, 2022 | Published online: August 29, 2022
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
|
Category
|
Determinant
|
Authors
|
|
Economic
|
Better budget
allocation
|
Švaljek, Rašić Bakarić and Sumpor (2019), Akyel,
Korkusuz-Polat and Arslankay (2012)
|
|
Budgetary process
|
Tanase (2013), Callahan (2002)
|
|
Efficiency
|
Sintomer et al. (2010), Džinić, Murray Svidroňová and Markowska-Bzducha (2016)
|
|
Social
|
Social justice,
gender mainstreaming
|
Sintomer, Röcke and Herzberg (2016),
Baiocchi and Ganuza (2014), Lüchmann (2017)
|
|
Citizen
empowerment, socio-economic development, culture
|
Saguin (2018), Wampler and Touchton (2019),
Röcke (2014), Talpin
(2012)
|
|
Political
|
Uncertainty of
decision-making
|
Baranowski (2020), Bardovič and Gašparík
(2021), Cho, Jérôme and Maurice (2021), Klimovský et al. (2021), Popławski
(2020)
|
|
Level of
administration maturity, level of political decentralisation
|
Beuermann and Amelina (2018)
|
|
Voter turnout,
direct democracy, public/citizen participation
|
Kukučková and Bakoš (2019), Freitag and
Stadelmann-Steffen (2010), Šabović, Milosavljević
and Benković (2021), Kukučková and Poláchová (2021)
|
|
Democratic
change, good governance
|
Cabannes and Lipietz (2018), Baiocchi
(2001)
|
|
Re-election of
the party or the mayor, political affiliation of the mayor
|
Spada (2009), Wampler and Avritzer (2005),
Klimovsky and Murray Svidronova (2021),
Klun and Benčina (2021)
|
|
Transparency of
political decisions, transparency of public resources
|
Jacobi (1999), Carroll et al. (2016),
Cabannes and Lipietz (2018)
|
|
Type of municipality
|
Total number
|
Total number with PB experience
|
Share of those with PB experience (%)
|
|
Regional
centres
|
9
|
3
|
33
|
|
District
centres
|
79
|
28
|
35
|
|
Other
municipalities
|
2,802
|
29
|
1
|
Source: Authors' elaboration.
|
Type of municipality
|
Participatory budgets not explicitly specified in local public budgets
|
|
Number
|
Share (%)
|
|
Regional centres
|
1
|
6
|
|
District centres
|
6
|
38
|
|
Other
municipalities
|
9
|
56
|
|
Total
|
16
|
100
|
Source: Authors' elaboration.
|
Year
|
PB first-timers
|
PB not specified in local public budgets
|
PB specified in local public budgets
|
Percentage of PB incorporation
|
|
2018
|
3
|
|
3
|
100
|
|
2019
|
16
|
7
|
9
|
56
|
|
2020
|
15
|
9
|
6
|
40
|
|
2021
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
Source: Authors' elaboration.
|
|
|
Length of period of
PB (years)
|
TIS ranking
|
|
2014
|
2016
|
2018
|
|
Length of period of PB (years)
|
Pearson Correlation
|
1
|
0.317
|
0.450**
|
0.653**
|
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
|
|
0.068
|
0.008
|
0.000
|
|
N
|
53
|
34
|
34
|
34
|
Source: Authors' elaboration.
|
Length of period of PB
(years)
|
Affiliation
|
Experience of
the mayor
|
Implementation of PB in 2020
|
|
of the mayor (year of
introduction)
- independent
|
of the mayor (2018)
- independent
|
of the majority of
councillors (year of introduction)
- independent
|
of the majority of
councillors (2018)
- independent
|
In year of introduction
|
2018
|
|
Length of period of PB (years)
|
Correlation Coefficient
|
1.000
|
-0.032
|
0.034
|
-0.191
|
-0.101
|
0.035
|
0.453*
|
0.023
|
|
Sig.
(2-tailed)
|
|
0.819
|
0.879
|
0.171
|
0.648
|
0.806
|
0.030
|
0.878
|
|
N
|
53
|
53
|
23
|
53
|
23
|
53
|
23
|
47
|
Source: Authors.
Crossmark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content. By applying the Crossmark logo, the Institute of Public Finance is committing to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur. Clicking on the Crossmark logo will tell you the current status of a document and may also give you additional publication record information about the document.
|
|
September, 2022
III/2022
|
