665
Views
76
Downloads |
Determinants of tax morale among university students in Croatia
Article | Year: 2025 | Pages: 645 - 666 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 4 Received: April 2, 2025 | Accepted: July 15, 2025 | Published online: December 2, 2025
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
|
Item
|
Frequency (N=770)
|
Percentage
|
|
Gender
|
|
Male
|
242
|
31.4
|
|
Female
|
528
|
68.6
|
|
Place of
birth
|
|
City
|
323
|
41.9
|
|
Municipalities on the coast
|
321
|
41.7
|
|
Municipalities inland
|
126
|
16.4
|
|
Region
|
|
Zagreb and northern Croatia
|
69
|
9.0
|
|
Slavonia
|
120
|
15.6
|
|
Gorski Kotar, Istria and Primorje
|
45
|
5.8
|
|
Dalmatia
|
473
|
61.4
|
|
Lika and Banovina
|
8
|
1.0
|
|
Outside Croatia
|
55
|
7.1
|
|
Type of
studies
|
|
Undergraduate
|
574
|
74.5
|
|
Graduate
|
174
|
22.6
|
|
Integrated
|
16
|
2.1
|
|
Postgraduate
|
6
|
0.8
|
|
Household
income
|
|
< 1,500 €
|
134
|
17.4
|
|
1,501 € – 2,500 €
|
309
|
40.1
|
|
2,501 € – 3,500 €
|
182
|
23.6
|
|
> 3,500 €
|
145
|
18.8
|
|
Financial
knowledge
|
|
Low
|
445
|
57.8
|
|
Good
|
118
|
15.5
|
|
Very good
|
114
|
14.8
|
|
Excellent
|
93
|
12.1
|
|
Tax knowledge
|
|
Low
|
577
|
75.0
|
|
Good
|
108
|
14.0
|
|
Very good
|
77
|
10.0
|
|
Excellent
|
8
|
1.0
|
Source: Author's calculations.
|
Tax moral (TMO)
|
Mean
|
St. dev.
|
|
TMO1
|
It is important to
me to pay my fair share of taxes.
|
3,83
|
1,13
|
|
TMO2
|
I would feel guilty
if I evaded taxes.
|
3,51
|
1,41
|
|
TMO3
|
I think paying taxes
is a civic duty.
|
1,02
|
1,11
|
|
TMO4
|
I do not consider it
acceptable that small businesses, in order to survive, pay their workers part
or all of their wages in cash, i.e., without paying taxes and contributions.
|
3,15
|
1,28
|
|
TMO5
|
I have never
knowingly participated in any form of tax evasion (such as receiving part of
my salary in cash, undeclared work, smuggling, or paying without a receipt).
|
3,51
|
1,52
|
|
Religiosity (REL)
|
|
REL1
|
How important is
religion in your life?
|
3,75
|
1,32
|
|
REL2
|
How religious are
you?
|
3,56
|
1,25
|
|
REL3
|
How important is God
in your life?
|
4,00
|
1,31
|
|
REL4
|
Except for weddings
and funerals, how often do you go to church?
|
2,87
|
1,23
|
|
Politics (POL)
|
|
POL1
|
What is your
political orientation? (1-left, 5-right)
|
3,08
|
1,07
|
|
POL2
|
What kind of a role
does the government have in the economy? (1-big, 5-small)
|
2,66
|
1,14
|
|
POL3
|
Do you support the
current Croatian government?
|
2,33
|
1,11
|
|
POL4
|
I don’t support the right
to abortion.
|
2,68
|
1,57
|
|
Trust in
institutions (TRUST)
|
|
TRUST1
|
I trust the national
government to responsibly manage public funds.
|
2,26
|
1,01
|
|
TRUST2
|
I trust public
institutions in Croatia.
|
2,51
|
1,01
|
|
TRUST3
|
I believe that my
tax money is effectively used for public services (e.g., health, education,
infrastructure)
|
2,37
|
1,06
|
|
TRUST4
|
Corruption rate in
Croatia is low.
|
2,05
|
1,23
|
|
Perception of the
fairness of the tax system (FAIR)
|
|
FAIR1
|
I think the tax
system in Croatia is fair.
|
2,36
|
0,95
|
|
FAIR2
|
I think that the tax
burden is fairly distributed among all citizens.
|
2,23
|
0,94
|
|
FAIR3
|
I think wealthy
individuals and large corporations pay their fair share of taxes.
|
2,28
|
1,00
|
|
FAIR4
|
Current tax rates are
not too high for me/my family.
|
2,52
|
1,08
|
|
Social norms (SNO)
|
|
SNO1
|
It is acceptable for
people to evade taxes if they have the opportunity.
|
2,12
|
1,27
|
|
SNO2
|
People in my
community often avoid paying taxes.
|
2,40
|
1,23
|
|
SNO3
|
I don’t feel
pressure in my environment to comply with tax laws.
|
2,82
|
1,17
|
|
SNO4
|
I don’t believe
others would report someone who evades taxes.
|
3,21
|
1,24
|
|
single-items
|
|
FIN
|
financial knowledge
(0-7)
|
3,73
|
2,24
|
|
TAX
|
tax knowledge (0-7)
|
3,01
|
1,88
|
Source: Author's calculations.
|
|
Loading
|
Cronbach’s α
|
rhoc
|
AVE
|
rhoA
|
|
REL1
|
0.945
|
0.933
|
0.952
|
0.832
|
0.945
|
|
REL2
|
0.941
|
|
REL3
|
0.906
|
|
REL4
|
0.855
|
|
POL2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
TRUST1
|
0.890
|
0.862
|
0.916
|
0.784
|
0.863
|
|
TRUST2
|
0.887
|
|
TRUST3
|
0.879
|
|
FAIR1
|
0.904
|
0.783
|
0.902
|
0.822
|
0.786
|
|
FAIR2
|
0.910
|
|
SNO1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
TMO1
|
0.856
|
0.777
|
0.870
|
0.691
|
0.780
|
|
TMO2
|
0.829
|
|
TMO3
|
0.809
|
|
FIN
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
TAX
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Note: Since the loadings for TRUST4, FAIR3, FAIR4, TMO4, TMO5 were lower than 0.708, they
were excluded from the model. Namely, as indicated in Hair et al. (2021), “indicator loadings
above 0.708 are recommended, since they indicate that the construct explains more than 50 percent
of the indicator’s variance, thus providing acceptable indicator reliability.” Additionally,
only POL2 and SNO1 are selected since the constructs’ reliability was not sufficient. Source: Author’s calculations in R.
|
|
REL
|
POL
|
TRUST
|
FAIR
|
SNO
|
FIN
|
TAX
|
TMO
|
|
REL
|
0.912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POL
|
0.065
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRUST
|
0.194
|
-0.004
|
0.885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR
|
0.146
|
-0.008
|
0.566
|
0.907
|
|
|
|
|
|
SNO
|
0.006
|
0.084
|
-0.029
|
-0.001
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
FIN
|
-0.087
|
-0.053
|
-0.101
|
0.005
|
0.013
|
1
|
|
|
|
TAX
|
-0.035
|
-0.014
|
-0.058
|
0.031
|
-0.046
|
0.568
|
1
|
|
|
TMO
|
0.120
|
-0.115
|
0.192
|
0.117
|
-0.424
|
-0.067
|
0.030
|
0.831
|
|
|
REL
|
POL
|
TRUST
|
FAIR
|
SNO
|
FIN
|
TAX
|
TMO
|
|
REL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POL
|
0.069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRUST
|
0.215
|
0.020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR
|
0.165
|
0.010
|
0.689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SNO
|
0.020
|
0.084
|
0.032
|
0.022
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIN
|
0.089
|
0.053
|
0.108
|
0.052
|
0.013
|
|
|
|
|
TAX
|
0.045
|
0.014
|
0.063
|
0.041
|
0.046
|
0.567
|
|
|
|
TMO
|
0.136
|
0.133
|
0.233
|
0.152
|
0.481
|
0.086
|
0.035
|
|
Source: Author’s calculations in R.
|
TMO
|
Path coefficient
|
t-statistics
|
Effect size
|
VIF
|
|
REL
|
0.092**
|
2.939
|
0.011
|
1.051
|
|
POL
|
-0.089**
|
-2.610
|
0.010
|
1.015
|
|
TRUST
|
0.148***
|
3.980
|
0.019
|
1.552
|
|
FAIR
|
0.017
|
0.447
|
0.001
|
1.486
|
|
SNO
|
-0.409***
|
-11.966
|
0.214
|
1.013
|
|
FIN
|
-0.082*
|
-2.210
|
0.004
|
1.504
|
|
TAX
|
0.068*
|
1.707
|
0.001
|
1.487
|
Note: * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01. Source: Author’s calculations in R.
Note: Using bootstrapping with 1,000 subsamples. Source: Author’s calculations in R.
|
|
n
|
REL
|
POL
|
TRUST
|
FAIR
|
SNO
|
FIN
|
TAX
|
|
Gender
|
|
Male
|
242
|
0.074
|
-0.088
|
0.111
|
0.062
|
-0.403
|
-0.004
|
0.091
|
|
Female
|
528
|
0.107
|
-0.088
|
0.165
|
-0.007
|
-0.402
|
-0.131
|
0.067
|
|
Significance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
High
|
145
|
0.051
|
-0.025
|
0.241
|
-0.093
|
-0.482
|
-0.200
|
0.116
|
|
Low
|
625
|
0.105
|
-0.101
|
0.130
|
0.034
|
-0.388
|
-0.061
|
0.064
|
|
Significance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age (>=23)
|
|
Older
|
217
|
0.083
|
-0.036
|
0.133
|
0.119
|
-0.504
|
-0.105
|
0.100
|
|
Younger
|
553
|
0.105
|
-0.121
|
0.157
|
-0.022
|
-0.362
|
-0.073
|
0.035
|
|
Significance
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
Place of birth
|
|
Bigger town
|
323
|
0.135
|
-0.084
|
0.091
|
0.021
|
-0.308
|
-0.133
|
0.043
|
|
Municipality or smaller town
|
447
|
0.071
|
-0.081
|
0.175
|
0.027
|
-0.483
|
-0.049
|
0.078
|
|
Significance
|
|
|
|
|
|
***
|
|
|
|
Region
|
|
Dalmatia
|
473
|
0.112
|
-0.092
|
0.184
|
0.031
|
-0.377
|
-0.055
|
-0.008
|
|
Other
|
297
|
0.087
|
-0.084
|
0.085
|
0.011
|
-0.446
|
-0.112
|
0.164
|
|
Significance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region
|
|
Zagreb and north Croatia
|
69
|
-0.064
|
0.177
|
0.335
|
0.027
|
-0.434
|
-0.067
|
0.301
|
|
Other
|
701
|
0.091
|
-0.111
|
0.165
|
-0.002
|
-0.403
|
-0.084
|
0.044
|
|
Significance
|
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Do you support the current Croatian
government?
|
|
Yes
|
95
|
0.119
|
-0.164
|
0.267
|
0.051
|
-0.212
|
-0.056
|
0.129
|
|
No
|
675
|
0.095
|
-0.074
|
0.122
|
0.013
|
-0.436
|
-0.081
|
0.055
|
|
Significance
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
**
|
|
|
|
What is your political orientation?
|
|
Right
|
209
|
0.083
|
-0.127
|
0.151
|
0.042
|
-0.449
|
-0.144
|
0.046
|
|
Left and centre
|
561
|
0.103
|
-0.071
|
0.141
|
0.002
|
-0.386
|
-0.047
|
0.078
|
|
Significance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01. Source: Author’s calculations in R.
Alexander, P. and Balavac-Orlic, M., 2022. Tax Morale: Framing and Fairness. Economic Systems, 46(1), 100936 [ CrossRef]
Alm, J. and Torgler, B., 2006. Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and in Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(2), pp. 224-246 [ CrossRef]
Batrancea, L. [et al.], 2019. Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 74, pp. 102-191 [ CrossRef]
Bejaković, P., 2009. Tax evasion, state capacity and trust in transitional countries: the case of Croatia. Društvena istraživanja, 18(4-5), pp. 787-805.
Bejaković, P. and Bezeredi, S., 2019. Determinants of Tax Morale in Croatia: an Ordered Logit Model. Business Systems Research, 10(2), pp. 37-48 [ CrossRef]
Blažić, H. and Štambuk, A., 2019. Citizens’ View on Taxation in a Post-Transition Country: The Case of Croatia. Društvena istraživanja, 28(4), pp, 627-646 [ CrossRef]
Cirman, A., Pahor, M. and Starček, S., 2021. Addressing evasion and tax morale by educating young taxpayers. Ljubljana: School of Economics and Business, University of Ljubljana, Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia.
Ciziceno, M., 2024. What shapes tax morality in younger generations? A comparative analysis between Gen Y and Gen Z. Sociology Compass, 18(2), e13179 [ CrossRef]
Cristea, L. A. [et al.], 2019. Is the Tax Burden a Generating Factor of Fiscal Evasion in South-East Europe? In: Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European Countries, pp. 153-169 [ CrossRef]
Crnogorac, M. and Lago-Peñas, S., 2020. Determinants of tax morale in former Yugoslavian countries. Eastern European Economics, 58(2), pp. 174-196 [ CrossRef]
Cummings, R. G. [et al.], 2009. Tax morale affects tax compliance: evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 70(3), pp. 447-457 [ CrossRef]
Gadžo, S. and Klemenčić, I., 2014. Time to stop avoiding the tax avoidance issue in Croatia? A proposal based on recent developments in the European Union. Financial Theory and Practice, 38(3), pp, 277-302 [ CrossRef]
Goksu, G. G. and Sahpaz, K. I., 2015. Comparison of Tax Morale of Turkish and Spanish Higher Education Students: The Samples of Sakarya University and the University of Zaragoza. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, pp. 222-230 [ CrossRef]
Hair Jr., J. F. [et al.], 2021. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer [ CrossRef]
Hair, J. F. [et al.], 2019. Multivariate Data Analysis. Andover: Cengage Learning.
Hair, J. F. [et al.], 2017. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd Edition. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Hauptman, L., Žmuk, B. and Pavić, I., 2024. Taxpayers’ attitudes toward tax compliance in the Slovenian tax system: differences according to gender, income level and size of settlement. Public Sector Economics, 48(2), pp, 177-201 [ CrossRef]
Islam, A. [et al.], 2020. Public policies and tax evasion: evidence from SAARC countries. Heliyon, 6(11), e05449 [ CrossRef]
Luttmer, E. F. P. and Singhal, M., 2014. Tax Morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), pp. 149-168 [ CrossRef]
McGee, R. and Shopovski, J., 2018. The Ethics of Tax Evasion: A Survey of Law and Economics Students in the Republic of Macedonia. International Journal of Economic Sciences, 7(2), pp. 57-69 [ CrossRef]
Molero, J. C. and Pujol, F., 2012. Walking Inside the Potential Tax Evader’s Mind: Tax Morale Does Matter. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), pp. 151-162 [ CrossRef]
Orumwense, K. E. and Aiwoho, D., 2021. Determinants of Tax Morale and Tax Compliance: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Accounting, 2(1), pp. 36-53.
Owusu, G. M. Y. [et al.], 2022. The effect of personality traits and tax morale on tax evasion intention. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(1), pp. 272-292 [ CrossRef]
Paleka, H., Karanović, G. and Badulescu, D., 2022. Tax compliance determinants: empirical evidence from Croatia. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(6), pp. 1915-1932 [ CrossRef]
Paleka, H. and Vitezić, V., 2023. Tax Compliance Challenge through Taxpayers’ Typology. Economies, 11(9) [ CrossRef]
Perica, I., 2021. The mediating role of managerial accounting in non-profit organizations: a structural equation modelling approach. Croatian Operational Research Review, 12(2), 139-149 [ CrossRef]
Pratama, A., 2017. Machiavellianism, tax knowledge, and ethical perceptions of tax avoidance: survey of undergraduate students in West Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 10(1), pp. 83-90 [ CrossRef]
Robbins, B. and Kiser, E., 2020. State coercion, moral attitudes, and tax compliance: Evidence from a national factorial survey experiment of income tax evasion. Social Science Research, 91, 102448 [ CrossRef]
Sanusi, S. [et al.], 2021. Tax Awareness Among Students from Higher Learning Institutions in Malaysia: Education Area as A Moderator. International Journal of Economics and Management, 15(1), pp. 89-102.
Sarasa Pérez, C.P. and Sarasa Pérez, J., 2016. University students’ tax morale: a study of gender within the University of Alicante, Spain. ICERI proceedings, pp. 4594-4599 [ CrossRef]
Torgler, B., 2005. Tax morale in Latin America. Public Choice, 122(1-2), pp. 133-157.
Vuković, M. and Pivac, S., 2021. Does financial behavior mediate the relationship between self-control and financial security? Croatian Operational Research Review, 12(1), pp. 27-36 [ CrossRef]
Vuković, M., 2024. CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM comparison in estimating the predictors of investment intention. Croatian Operational Research Review, 15(2), pp. 131-144 [ CrossRef]
Yasa, N. I. P. [et al.], 2021. Tax Comprehension and Ethics Education Integration in Improving Tax Compliance Among Accounting Students. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 10(1), pp. 96-108 [ CrossRef]
|
|
December, 2025
IV/2025
|
