1566 Views
133 Downloads |
Fiscal dominance and inflation: evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa*
Article | Year: 2024 | Pages: 363 - 391 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 48 Received: November 10, 2023 | Accepted: April 23, 2024 | Published online: September 3, 2024
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
Sources: Central Bank Legislation Database (CBLD); national authorities; and IMF staff
calculations.
Sources: CBLD; International Financial Statistics (IFS); World Economic Outlook (WEO);
national authorities; and IMF staff calculations.
Sources: CBLD; national authorities; MFS; WEO; and IMF staff calculations.
Variable
|
No. of obs.
|
Mean
|
St. Dev.
|
Min.
|
Max.
|
Central bank claims/GDP
|
719
|
6.1
|
8.9
|
0.0
|
63.2
|
Percentage change of central bank claims/GDP
|
675
|
5.2
|
22.8
|
-217.5
|
150.7
|
Central bank loans/GDP
|
719
|
3.7
|
5.6
|
0.0
|
61.5
|
Percentage change of central bank loans/GDP
|
677
|
2.1
|
21.6
|
-260.5
|
162.1
|
Fiscal deficit/GDP
|
756
|
2.6
|
5.6
|
-27.2
|
30.4
|
Real GDP Growth
|
770
|
4.6
|
5.2
|
-36.7
|
60.1
|
Legal Limit/revenue
|
703
|
11.2
|
7.8
|
0.0
|
25.0
|
Government deposits/GDP
|
731
|
4.4
|
5.1
|
0.0
|
33.0
|
Government gross debt/GDP
|
754
|
62.1
|
49.6
|
0.5
|
406.7
|
Dummy for domestic market development (1 or 0)
|
781
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
0.0
|
1.0
|
Dummy for IMF conditionality on central bank
lending (1 or 0)
|
781
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
0.0
|
1.0
|
Interaction between fiscal deficit and legal
limits (%*%)
|
678
|
15.7
|
88.6
|
-610.1
|
545
|
Sources: WEO; IFS; and IMF staff calculations.
|
(1)
|
(2)
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
(5)
|
Dependent
variable: Central bank loans/GDP
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 3
|
Model 4
|
Model 5
|
Fiscal deficit
|
0.1041***
|
0.0362
|
0.0409*
|
0.0216
|
0.0267
|
(0.0359)
|
(0.0254)
|
(0.0209)
|
(0.0262)
|
(0.0220)
|
Fiscal deficit × Legal limit
|
|
0.0046***
|
0.0053***
|
0.0055***
|
0.0062***
|
|
(0.0015)
|
(0.0014)
|
(0.0019)
|
(0.0018)
|
Fiscal deficit × Domestic market development
|
|
|
-0.0639**
|
|
-0.0622**
|
|
|
(0.0284)
|
|
(0.0260)
|
Fiscal deficit × IMF conditionality
|
|
|
|
-0.0269*
|
-0.0255**
|
|
|
|
(0.0149)
|
(0.0123)
|
Legal
limit
|
|
-0.0014
|
0.0007
|
-0.0036
|
-0.0018
|
|
(0.0317)
|
(0.0344)
|
(0.0318)
|
(0.0343)
|
Domestic
market development
|
|
|
-0.9234**
|
|
-0.8080**
|
|
|
(0.4267)
|
|
(0.3835)
|
IMF
conditionality
|
|
|
|
-0.7964
|
-0.6888
|
|
|
|
(0.5420)
|
(0.5166)
|
Lags
of central bank loans/GDP
|
0.8049***
|
0.7952***
|
0.7992***
|
0.7904***
|
0.7952***
|
(0.0461)
|
(0.0381)
|
(0.0402)
|
(0.0354)
|
(0.0368)
|
Lag
of real GDP growth
|
-0.0163
|
-0.0223**
|
-0.0210**
|
-0.0221**
|
-0.0209**
|
(0.0115)
|
(0.0108)
|
(0.0098)
|
(0.0112)
|
(0.0100)
|
Lag
of government deposit/GDP
|
-0.0737
|
-0.0811
|
-0.0952
|
-0.0735
|
-0.0873
|
(0.0739)
|
(0.0606)
|
(0.0640)
|
(0.0598)
|
(0.0630)
|
Lag
of government debt/GDP
|
-0.0100*
|
-0.0035
|
-0.0026
|
-0.0073
|
-0.0062
|
(0.0057)
|
(0.0067)
|
(0.0070)
|
(0.0068)
|
(0.0068)
|
Observations
|
667
|
596
|
596
|
596
|
596
|
Number
of countries
|
45
|
41
|
41
|
41
|
41
|
Robust standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1.
Variable
|
No. of obs.
|
Mean
|
St. Dev.
|
Min.
|
Max.
|
Base money
|
729
|
11.0
|
7.4
|
0.1
|
52.8
|
Exchange
rate
|
780
|
4.6
|
16.6
|
-28.1
|
295.5
|
Inflation
|
764
|
8.2
|
18.0
|
-72.7
|
357.3
|
Broad money
|
764
|
32.4
|
24.2
|
3.1
|
150.8
|
Notes: Base money is defined as a ratio to nominal GDP, exchange rates are defined as the
annual percent change in terms of national currency per USD, inflation is the annual growth
rate of CPI, and broad money is defined as a ratio to nominal GDP. Sources: WEO; IFS; and IMF staff calculations.
Notes: The figure shows the impulse response functions for a one unit innovation in the ratio of
central bank loans to GDP and presents both the point estimates and the 68 and 90 percent confidence
intervals around them.
Country name
|
Legal limit
|
Name of most recent legislation
|
Year current legislation took effect (last amendment)
|
Angola
|
10% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Banco Nacional de Angola
Act. Law No. 16/10 15 July
|
2010
|
Benin
|
0%
|
Treaty of the West African
Monetary Union (UEMOA)
|
N/S
|
Botswana
|
5% of previous three years’
average revenue
|
The Bank of Botswana Act.
1996
|
1997
|
Burkina Faso
|
0%
|
Treaty of the West African
Monetary Union (UEMOA)
|
N/S
|
Burundi
|
N/A
|
|
|
Cabo Verde
|
5% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Organic Law of the Bank of
Cape Verde, 2002
|
2002
|
Cameroon
|
20% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Charter of the Bank of
Central African States, 2010 (CEMAC)
|
2010
|
Central African Republic
|
20% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Charter of the Bank of
Central African States, 2010 (CEMAC)
|
2010
|
Chad
|
20% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Charter of the Bank of
Central African States, 2010 (CEMAC)
|
2010
|
Comoros
|
20% of previous three years’
average revenue
|
Statuts de la Banque
Centrale des Comoros, 2008
|
2008
|
Congo, Democratic Rep. of
|
0%
|
Law 005/2002 on the Establishment,
Organization, and Operations of the Central Bank of Congo, May 7, 2002
|
2002
|
Congo, Republic of
|
20% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Charter of the Bank of
Central African States, 2010 (CEMAC)
|
2010
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
0%
|
Treaty of the West African
Monetary Union (UEMOA)
|
N/S
|
Equatorial Guinea
|
20% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Charter of the Bank of
Central African States, 2010 (CEMAC)
|
2010
|
Eritrea
|
N/A
|
|
|
Ethiopia
|
N/S
|
Monetary and Banking
Proclamation No. 183/1994 and No. 591/2008
|
1994 (2008)
|
Gabon
|
20% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Charter of the Bank of
Central African States, 2010 (CEMAC)
|
2010
|
Gambia, The
|
10% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Central Bank of Gambia Act, 2005
|
2005
|
Ghana
|
5% of current year’s revenue
|
Bank of Ghana Act, 24th
January 2002
|
2002 (2016)
|
Guinea
|
5% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Charter of the Central Bank
of the Republic of Guinea, 1994
|
1994 (2017)
|
Guinea-Bissau
|
0%
|
Treaty of the West African
Monetary Union (UEMOA)
|
N/S
|
Kenya
|
5% of previous year’s
revenue
|
The Central Bank of Kenya
Act
|
1966 (2014)
|
Lesotho
|
Net claim is 5% of previous
year’s budget
|
Central Bank of Lesotho Act,
2000
|
2000
|
Madagascar
|
7% of previous year’s revenue
|
Charter of the Central Bank of Madagascar,
1994
|
1994 (2016)
|
Malawi
|
20% of current year’s revenue
|
Reserve Bank of Malawi Act - Laws of Malawi
(Chapter 44:02), 1989
|
1989
|
Mali
|
0%
|
Treaty of the West African
Monetary Union (UEMOA)
|
N/S
|
Mauritania
|
5% of previous year’s revenue
|
Charter of the Central Bank of Mauritania
|
2007
|
Mauritius
|
10% of current year’s revenue
|
The Bank of Mauritius Act, 2004
|
2004 (2015)
|
Mozambique
|
10% of previous year’s revenue
|
Law 1/92 of January 3, 1992
|
1992
|
Namibia
|
25% of previous three years’ average revenue
|
Bank of Namibia Act, 1997
|
1997
|
Niger
|
0%
|
Treaty of the West African
Monetary Union (UEMOA)
|
N/S
|
Nigeria
|
5% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Central Bank of Nigeria Act,
2007
|
2007
|
Rwanda
|
11% of previous year’s government
revenue
|
Law No. 55/2007 of 30/11/2007 Governing the
Central Bank of Rwanda
|
2007
|
São Tomé and Príncipe
|
5% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Law 8/92, Organic Law of the
Central Bank of STP, 1992
|
1992
|
Senegal
|
0%
|
Treaty of the West African Monetary
Union (UEMOA)
|
N/S
|
Seychelles
|
N/S
|
Central Bank of Seychelles
Act, 2004
|
2004 (2011)
|
Sierra Leone
|
5% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Bank of Sierra Leone Act,
2000
|
2000
|
South Africa
|
N/S
|
South African Reserve Bank
Act 90, 1989
|
1989
|
Sudan
|
15% of current year’s
revenue
|
The Bank of Sudan Act, 2002
|
2002
|
Swaziland (Eswatini)
|
20% of previous three years’
average revenue
|
The Central Bank of
Swaziland Order, 1974
|
1974 (1979)
|
Tanzania
|
12.5 % of previous year’s
revenue
|
The Bank of Tanzania Act,
2006
|
2006 (2010)
|
Togo
|
0%
|
Treaty of the West African
Monetary Union (UEMOA)
|
N/S
|
Uganda
|
18% of previous year’s
revenue
|
The Bank of Uganda Statute,
1993
|
1993 (2010)
|
Zambia
|
15% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Bank of Zambia (Amendment)
Act, 1998
|
1998
|
Zimbabwe
|
20% of previous year’s
revenue
|
Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Act
(Chapter 22:15)
|
2010
|
Notes: N/S indicates not specified in the Central Bank Act, while N/A indicates no Central Bank
Act was found in the CBLD database or on the websites of the relevant Central Bank or Ministry
of Finance. Sources: National Authorities; and Central Bank Legislation Database (CBLD).
Dependent variable: Central bank loans/GDP
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 3
|
Model 4
|
Model 5
|
Fiscal deficit
|
0.0156
|
-0.0329
|
-0.0172
|
-0.0077
|
-0.0010
|
(0.0416)
|
(0.0415)
|
(0.0312)
|
(0.0243)
|
(0.0207)
|
Fiscal deficit × Legal limit
|
|
0.0066**
|
0.0053**
|
0.0056***
|
0.0053**
|
|
(0.0028)
|
(0.0025)
|
(0.0021)
|
(0.0021)
|
Fiscal deficit × Domestic market development
|
|
|
0.0202
|
|
-0.0148
|
|
|
(0.0555)
|
|
(0.0427)
|
Fiscal deficit × IMF conditionality
|
|
|
|
-0.0252**
|
-0.0239**
|
|
|
|
(0.0119)
|
(0.0107)
|
Legal
limit
|
|
0.0098
|
0.0122
|
0.0139
|
0.0043
|
|
(0.0185)
|
(0.0152)
|
(0.0226)
|
(0.0210)
|
Domestic
market development
|
|
|
-0.8749***
|
|
-0.7560***
|
|
|
(0.2580)
|
|
(0.2244)
|
IMF
conditionality
|
|
|
|
-0.5713
|
-0.5919
|
|
|
|
(0.4638)
|
(0.4116)
|
Lags
of central bank loans/GDP
|
0.7584***
|
0.7355***
|
0.7319***
|
0.7243***
|
0.7237***
|
(0.0264)
|
(0.0315)
|
(0.0311)
|
(0.0269)
|
(0.0275)
|
Lag
of real GDP growth
|
-0.0143
|
-0.0130
|
-0.0146*
|
-0.0163
|
-0.0166*
|
(0.0106)
|
(0.0100)
|
(0.0087)
|
(0.0102)
|
(0.0093)
|
Lag
of government deposit/GDP
|
-0.0248
|
-0.0328
|
-0.0356
|
-0.0265
|
-0.0264
|
(0.0443)
|
(0.0341)
|
(0.0314)
|
(0.0270)
|
(0.0270)
|
Lag
of government debt/GDP
|
-0.0022
|
0.0057**
|
0.0059**
|
0.0051**
|
0.0042**
|
0.0156
|
-0.0329
|
-0.0172
|
-0.0077
|
-0.0010
|
Observations
|
667
|
596
|
596
|
596
|
596
|
Number
of countries
|
45
|
41
|
41
|
41
|
41
|
Robust standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1.
Dependent variable: Central bank claims/GDP
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 3
|
Model 4
|
Model 5
|
Fiscal deficit
|
0.1449***
|
0.0375*
|
0.0398*
|
0.0274
|
0.0298
|
(0.0460)
|
(0.0228)
|
(0.0210)
|
(0.0245)
|
(0.0230)
|
Fiscal deficit × Legal limit
|
|
0.0037**
|
0.0038**
|
0.0044**
|
0.0046**
|
|
(0.0015)
|
(0.0016)
|
(0.0020)
|
(0.0020)
|
Fiscal deficit × Domestic market development
|
|
|
-0.0184
|
|
-0.0187
|
|
|
(0.0373)
|
|
(0.0355)
|
Fiscal deficit × IMF conditionality
|
|
|
|
-0.0183
|
-0.0181
|
|
|
|
(0.0153)
|
(0.0135)
|
Legal
limit (measured in percent of revenue)
|
|
0.0339
|
0.0384
|
0.0320
|
0.0359
|
|
(0.0382)
|
(0.0390)
|
(0.0404)
|
(0.0410)
|
Domestic
market development
|
|
|
-0.6718
|
|
-0.5889
|
|
|
(0.4664)
|
|
(0.4591)
|
IMF
conditionality
|
|
|
|
-0.6187
|
-0.5315
|
|
|
|
(0.6402)
|
(0.6146)
|
Lags
of central bank claims/GDP
|
0.8974***
|
0.8269***
|
0.8272***
|
0.8240***
|
0.8251***
|
(0.0752)
|
(0.0360)
|
(0.0374)
|
(0.0335)
|
(0.0348)
|
Lag
of real GDP growth
|
-0.0270
|
-0.0254
|
-0.0235
|
-0.0270
|
-0.0252
|
(0.0174)
|
(0.0206)
|
(0.0192)
|
(0.0211)
|
(0.0195)
|
Lag
of government deposit/GDP
|
-0.0839
|
-0.0733
|
-0.0786
|
-0.0704
|
-0.0756
|
(0.0768)
|
(0.0626)
|
(0.0634)
|
(0.0643)
|
(0.0652)
|
Lag
of government debt/GDP
|
-0.0148**
|
-0.0105
|
-0.0103
|
-0.0129*
|
-0.0125
|
(0.0068)
|
(0.0078)
|
(0.0080)
|
(0.0077)
|
(0.0078)
|
Observations
|
667
|
596
|
596
|
596
|
596
|
Number
of countries
|
45
|
41
|
41
|
41
|
41
|
Robust standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1.
Dependent variable: Change in Central bank
loans/GDP
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 3
|
Model 4
|
Model 5
|
Fiscal deficit
|
0.6263**
|
0.0935
|
0.1016
|
-0.0331
|
-0.0253
|
(0.3038)
|
(0.2369)
|
(0.2366)
|
(0.2522)
|
(0.2538)
|
Fiscal deficit × Legal limit
|
|
0.0415***
|
0.0441***
|
0.0540***
|
0.0565***
|
|
(0.0159)
|
(0.0157)
|
(0.0205)
|
(0.0200)
|
Fiscal deficit × Domestic market development
|
|
|
-0.1821
|
|
-0.1929
|
|
|
(0.3505)
|
|
(0.3321)
|
Fiscal deficit × IMF conditionality
|
|
|
|
-0.2427*
|
-0.2372**
|
|
|
|
(0.1256)
|
(0.1150)
|
Legal
limit
|
|
0.6758
|
0.6126
|
0.5591
|
0.4772
|
|
(0.5628)
|
(0.5009)
|
(0.4962)
|
(0.4424)
|
Domestic
market development
|
|
|
3.9462
|
|
4.9117
|
|
|
(5.6728)
|
|
(4.9638)
|
IMF
conditionality
|
|
|
|
-8.8235
|
-9.2823
|
|
|
|
(6.8652)
|
(6.9630)
|
Lags
of change in central bank loans/GDP
|
-0.1952**
|
0.0203
|
0.0146
|
0.0052
|
-0.0022
|
(0.0942)
|
(0.0628)
|
(0.0677)
|
(0.0632)
|
(0.0689)
|
Lag
of real GDP growth
|
-0.1873
|
-0.2062
|
-0.1960
|
-0.2132
|
-0.2001
|
(0.1644)
|
(0.2083)
|
(0.2150)
|
(0.2213)
|
(0.2274)
|
Lag
of government deposit/GDP
|
-1.1335*
|
-0.8138*
|
-0.7709*
|
-0.7390
|
-0.6889
|
(0.6185)
|
(0.4752)
|
(0.4557)
|
(0.4700)
|
(0.4486)
|
Lag
of government debt/GDP
|
-0.0873*
|
-0.0132
|
-0.0059
|
-0.0373
|
-0.0280
|
(0.0468)
|
(0.0818)
|
(0.0852)
|
(0.0753)
|
(0.0771)
|
Observations
|
629
|
561
|
561
|
561
|
561
|
Number
of countries
|
45
|
41
|
41
|
41
|
41
|
Robust standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1.
Dependent variable: Central bank loans/GDP
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 3
|
Fiscal deficit
|
0.0370
|
0.0734*
|
0.0752*
|
(0.0253)
|
(0.0394)
|
(0.0400)
|
Fiscal deficit × Legal limit
|
0.0046***
|
0.0056**
|
0.0056**
|
(0.0015)
|
(0.0022)
|
(0.0022)
|
Fiscal deficit × Domestic market dvpt+Eurobond access
|
-0.0358
|
|
-0.0887
|
(0.0778)
|
|
(0.1133)
|
Fiscal deficit × Sovereign risk
|
|
-0.0054
|
-0.0054
|
|
(0.0042)
|
(0.0042)
|
Legal
limit
|
-0.0013
|
-0.0181
|
-0.0172
|
(0.0321)
|
(0.0470)
|
(0.0474)
|
Domestic
market dvpt+ Eurobond access
|
0.1744
|
|
0.6700
|
(0.6399)
|
|
(0.8910)
|
Sovereign
risk
|
|
-0.0541
|
-0.0576
|
|
(0.1557)
|
(0.1515)
|
Lags
of central bank loans/GDP
|
0.7947***
|
0.7908***
|
0.7887***
|
(0.0382)
|
(0.0533)
|
(0.0533)
|
Lag
of real GDP growth
|
-0.0221**
|
-0.0207
|
-0.0204
|
(0.0108)
|
(0.0145)
|
(0.0147)
|
Lag
of government deposit/GDP
|
-0.0805
|
-0.1272
|
-0.1242
|
(0.0605)
|
(0.0888)
|
(0.0885)
|
Lag
of government debt/GDP
|
-0.0034
|
-0.0023
|
-0.0023
|
(0.0066)
|
(0.0068)
|
(0.0066)
|
Observations
|
596
|
443
|
443
|
Number
of countries
|
41
|
35
|
35
|
Robust standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1. Notes: Sovereign risk measures the risk of debt distress using the ratings from the IMF’s Debt Sustainability Analysis (=0 if the rating is “Low”; =1 if the rating is
“Moderate”=2 if the rating is “High”=3 if the rating is “In debt distress”). Eurobond access is a dummy (=1 if the country has previously issued a Eurobond, 0 otherwise).
Dependent variable: Central bank loans/GDP
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 3
|
Model 4
|
Model 5
|
Fiscal deficit
|
0.0833***
|
0.0050
|
0.0085
|
-0.0007
|
0.0031
|
(0.0173)
|
(0.0210)
|
(0.0211)
|
(0.0208)
|
(0.0208)
|
Fiscal deficit × Legal limit
|
|
0.0037***
|
0.0040***
|
0.0047***
|
0.0050***
|
|
(0.0012)
|
(0.0013)
|
(0.0013)
|
(0.0013)
|
Fiscal deficit × Domestic market development
|
|
|
-0.0464*
|
|
-0.0469*
|
|
|
(0.0243)
|
|
(0.0242)
|
Fiscal deficit × IMF conditionality
|
|
|
|
-0.0336***
|
-0.0314**
|
|
|
|
(0.0126)
|
(0.0127)
|
Legal
limit
|
|
-0.0149
|
-0.0166
|
-0.0179
|
-0.0192
|
|
(0.0264)
|
(0.0265)
|
(0.0262)
|
(0.0263)
|
Domestic
market development
|
|
|
0.0921
|
|
0.1098
|
|
|
(0.2347)
|
|
(0.2330)
|
IMF
conditionality
|
|
|
|
-0.1878
|
-0.2600
|
|
|
|
(0.1926)
|
(0.1933)
|
Lags
of central bank loans/GDP
|
0.7609***
|
0.7748***
|
0.7716***
|
0.7741***
|
0.7707***
|
(0.0233)
|
(0.0173)
|
(0.0176)
|
(0.0172)
|
(0.0175)
|
Lag
of real GDP growth
|
-0.0250
|
-0.0217*
|
-0.0195
|
-0.0209*
|
-0.0187
|
(0.0157)
|
(0.0123)
|
(0.0123)
|
(0.0122)
|
(0.0122)
|
Lag
of government deposit/GDP
|
-0.0218
|
-0.0397*
|
-0.0381*
|
-0.0389*
|
-0.0370*
|
(0.0231)
|
(0.0206)
|
(0.0209)
|
(0.0205)
|
(0.0207)
|
Lag
of government debt/GDP
|
-0.0010
|
-0.0018
|
-0.0014
|
-0.0036*
|
-0.0032
|
(0.0027)
|
(0.0021)
|
(0.0021)
|
(0.0021)
|
(0.0022)
|
Observations
|
667
|
596
|
596
|
596
|
596
|
Number
of countries
|
45
|
41
|
41
|
41
|
41
|
Robust standard errors in parentheses. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, *p<0.1.
Dependent variable
|
Horizon
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
Base Money
|
580
|
545
|
507
|
469
|
430
|
391
|
354
|
(40)
|
(40)
|
(40)
|
(40)
|
(40)
|
(38)
|
(37)
|
Exchange Rate
|
596
|
560
|
521
|
482
|
442
|
402
|
364
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(39)
|
(38)
|
Inflation
|
596
|
560
|
521
|
482
|
442
|
402
|
364
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(39)
|
(38)
|
Broad Money
|
596
|
560
|
521
|
482
|
442
|
402
|
364
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(41)
|
(39)
|
(38)
|
Note: The table summarizes the number of observations and the number of countries in each local
projection. The number of observations in each regression is less than in the summary statistics
because a full set of data is not available for all the control variables.
Angola
|
Madagascar
|
Benin
|
Malawi
|
Botswana
|
Mali
|
Burkina Faso
|
Mauritania
|
Burundi
|
Mauritius
|
Cabo Verde
|
Mozambique
|
Cameroon
|
Namibia
|
Central African Republic
|
Niger
|
Chad
|
Nigeria
|
Comoros
|
Rwanda
|
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
|
São Tomé and Principe
|
Congo, Rep.
|
Senegal
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Seychelles
|
Equatorial Guinea
|
Sierra Leone
|
Eritrea
|
South Africa
|
Ethiopia
|
Sudan
|
Gabon
|
Swaziland
|
Gambia
|
Tanzania
|
Ghana
|
Togo
|
Guinea
|
Uganda
|
Guinea-Bissau
|
Zambia
|
Kenya
|
Zimbabwe
|
Lesotho
|
|
Alesina, A. and Summers, L. H., 1993. Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance: some comparative evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 25(2), pp. 151-162 [ CrossRef]
Alpanda, S. and Honig, A., 2009. The impact of central bank independence on political monetary cycles in advanced and developing nations. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(7), pp. 1365-1389 [ CrossRef]
Arellano, M. and Bover, O., 1995. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), pp. 29-51 [ CrossRef]
Blundell, R. and Bond, S., 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), pp. 115-143 [ CrossRef]
Bordo, M. D. and Siklos. P. L., 2018. Central Banks: Evolution and Innovation in Historical Perspective. In: R. Edvinsson, T. Jacobson and D. Waldenström (eds.). Sveriges Riksbank and the History of Central Banking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [ CrossRef]
Bruno, G. S., 2005. Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Economics letters, 87(3), pp. 361-366 [ CrossRef]
Cagan, P., 1956. The monetary dynamics of hyperinflation. In: M. Friedman, ed. Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cottarelli, C., 1993. Limiting central bank credit to the government: theory and practice. In: Limiting Central Bank Credit to the Government. Washington: International Monetary Fund [ CrossRef]
Fischer, S., 1995. Central-bank independence revisited. The American Economic Review, 85(2), pp. 201-206.
Galí, J., 2020. The effects of a money-financed fiscal stimulus. Journal of Monetary Economics, 115, pp. 1-19 [ CrossRef]
Garriga, A. C. and Rodriguez, C. M., 2020. More effective than we thought: Central bank independence and inflation in developing countries. Economic Modelling, 85, pp. 87-105 [ CrossRef]
Hanke, S. H. and Krus, N., 2013. World hyperinflations. In: R. Parker and R. Whaples, eds. Routledge handbook of major events in economic history, pp. 367-377.
IMF, 2014. Sub-Saharan Africa: Regional Economic Outlook, April. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
IMF, 2018. Sub-Saharan Africa: Regional Economic Outlook, October. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
IMF, 2020. Sub-Saharan Africa: Regional Economic Outlook, April. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Jácome, L. I. [et al.], 2012. Central Bank Credit to the Government: What Can We Learn from International Practices? IMF Working Paper, No. 12/16 [ CrossRef]
Jordà, Ò., 2005. Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review, 95(1), pp. 161-182 [ CrossRef]
Sikken, B. J. and Haan, J. D., 1998. Budget deficits, monetization, and centralbank independence in developing countries. Oxford Economic Papers, 50(3), pp. 493-511 [ CrossRef]
Sargent, T. J. and Wallace, N., 1981. Some unpleasant monetarist arithmetic. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 5(3), pp. 1-17 [ CrossRef]
Sims, C. A., 1980. Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp.1-48 [ CrossRef]
Yashiv, E. 2020. Breaking the taboo: The political economy of COVID-motivated helicopter drops. VoxEU.org, 26 March 2020.
|
|
September, 2024 III/2024
|