3305 Views
227 Downloads |
Fiscal policy burden accruing from public debt accumulation: theoretical effect on growth and empirical evidence
Samson Edo*
Osaro Oigiangbe*
Osaro Oigiangbe
Affiliation: Department of Economics, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria
0009-0009-3580-6972
Article | Year: 2025 | Pages: 129 - 152 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 1 Received: March 15, 2024 | Accepted: August 19, 2024 | Published online: March 10, 2025
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
|
Angola
|
Djibouti
|
Madagascar
|
Sierra Leone
|
|
Benin
|
Equatorial Guinea
|
Malawi
|
Somalia
|
|
Botswana
|
Eswatini*
|
Mali
|
South Africa
|
|
Burkina Faso
|
Eritrea
|
Mauritania*
|
South Sudan*
|
|
Burundi
|
Ethiopia
|
Mauritius
|
Sudan
|
|
Cameroon
|
Gabon
|
Mozambique
|
Tanzania
|
|
Cape Verde
|
Gambia
|
Namibia
|
Togo
|
|
Central African Rep.
|
Ghana
|
Niger
|
Uganda
|
|
Chad
|
Guinea
|
Nigeria
|
Zambia
|
|
Comoros
|
Guinea-Bissau*
|
Rwanda
|
Zimbabwe
|
|
Congo DRC
|
Kenya
|
Sao Tome & Principe
|
|
|
Congo Rep.
|
Lesotho
|
Senegal
|
|
|
Cote d’Ivoire
|
Liberia*
|
Seychelles
|
|
*Not included in study sample due to lack of complete data. Source: World Bank Open database.
|
Sample size = 45 countries
|
|
Estimation period = 1990-2022
|
|
Observations = 1,485
|
|
|
Statistic
|
|
Variable
|
Mean
|
Median
|
Max.
|
Min.
|
Std. dev.
|
Skewness (Pearson coefficient)
|
Kurtosis
|
Jarque-Bera test
|
|
EG
|
3.3
|
2.87
|
6.1
|
-2.1
|
4.3
|
0.55
|
3.9
|
0.16
|
|
FT
|
56.1
|
55.3
|
78.6
|
31.2
|
23.7
|
0.59
|
4.6
|
0.22
|
|
FD
|
42.3
|
40.1
|
60.4
|
26.6
|
17.1
|
0.61
|
3.7
|
0.09
|
|
PC
|
23.2
|
22.5
|
25.5
|
17.3
|
4.7
|
0.56
|
3.2
|
0.18
|
|
HC
|
61.4
|
60.4
|
68.3
|
52.1
|
8.2
|
0.53
|
2.5
|
0.11
|
|
TR
|
33.9
|
42.3
|
59.7
|
27.5
|
19.4
|
0.34
|
2.8
|
0.14
|
|
PG
|
2.6
|
2.5
|
2.9
|
2.2
|
0.33
|
0.52
|
4.9
|
0.27
|
Source: Authors’ computer estimation.
|
Sample size: 45
countries
|
|
Estimation
period: 1990-2022
|
|
Unit root test
|
|
Variable
|
Level
|
First difference
|
|
LLC
|
IPS
|
HD
|
LLC
|
IPS
|
HD
|
|
EG
|
3.14*
|
2.88*
|
1.31*
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
FT
|
1.23
|
1.03
|
2.99
|
2.64*
|
3.22*
|
1.34*
|
|
FD
|
1.16
|
1.09
|
2.74
|
2.57*
|
2.83*
|
1.19*
|
|
PC
|
1.11
|
1.07
|
3.03
|
2.79*
|
2.44*
|
1.21*
|
|
HC
|
1.18
|
1.15
|
2.87
|
3.05*
|
2.58*
|
1.06*
|
|
TR
|
1.09
|
1.21
|
3.11
|
2.64*
|
3.01*
|
1.11*
|
|
PG
|
1.12
|
1.16
|
3.06
|
2.55*
|
2.39*
|
1.17*
|
|
Critical values:
LLC = 2.06, IPS = 1.95, HD = 1.87
|
*Variable is stationary. Variables: EG = economic growth, FT = fiscal policy burden from total debt, FD = fiscal policy burden from domestic component of total public debt, PC = physical capital, HC = human capital, TR = trade, PG = population growth. Note: LLC = Levin-Lin-Chu test, IPS = Im-Pesaran-Shin test, HD = Hadri test. In LLC and IPS, larger statistics indicate more stationary variables. In HD, smaller statistics indicate more stationary variables. Source: Authors’ computer estimation.
|
Dependent variable
|
Explanatory
variable
|
|
EG
|
FT
|
FD
|
PC
|
HC
|
TR
|
PG
|
EG-1
|
EG-2
|
|
-0.61*
(-3.17)
|
-0.52*
(-2.13)
|
0.64*
(3.33)
|
0.56*
(2.28)
|
0.50*
(2.13)
|
-0.34
(-1.02)
|
0.49*
(2.04)
|
0.47*
(1.99)
|
|
Diagnostic test
|
|
Pearson chi-square test for
goodness of fit
(critical p-value = 0.05)
|
Sargan test
(0.05 ˂ p ≤ 1)
|
A-B 1st order
correlation test
(0 ˂ p ˂ 0.1)
|
A-B 2nd order
correlation test
(0.25 ˂ p ≤ 1)
|
Akaike (AIC)
|
|
2.01
(0.019)
|
6.92
(0.38)
|
2.32
(0.07)
|
1.24
(0.36)
|
12.06
(Minimum)
|
* Significant at 5%, t-values in parenthesis. In diagnostic test p-values are in parenthesis. A-B stands for Arellano-Bond. Variables: EG = economic growth, FT = fiscal policy burden from total debt, FD = fiscal policy burden from component of total public debt, PC = physical capital,
HC = human capital, TR = trade, PG = population growth, EG-1 and EG-2 = lagged dependent variables (instrumental variables). Source: Authors’ computer estimation.
|
Dependent variable: EG
|
|
Independent
variable
|
FD excluded
|
FT excluded
|
|
Coefficient
|
t-value
|
Coefficient
|
t-value
|
|
Intercept
|
2.11
|
8.73
|
1.94
|
1.99
|
|
FT
|
-0.57*
|
2.31
|
–
|
–
|
|
FD
|
–
|
–
|
-0.39*
|
2.17
|
|
PC
|
0.60*
|
3.11
|
0.58*
|
2.86
|
|
HC
|
0.51*
|
2.31
|
0.46*
|
2.19
|
|
TR
|
0.43*
|
2.08
|
0.50*
|
2.28
|
|
PG
|
-0.24
|
0.97
|
-0.27
|
1.07
|
|
EG-1
|
0.40*
|
2.01
|
0.38*
|
2.12
|
|
EG-2
|
0.46*
|
2.22
|
0.41*
|
2.09
|
|
Sargan test
|
3.03
|
2.56
|
|
(0.05 ˂ p ≤ 1)
|
(0.29)
|
(0.41)
|
*Significant at the 5% level. Source: Authors’ computer estimation.
|
Dependent
variable
|
Explanatory
variable
|
MG estimator
|
PMG estimator
|
|
Coefficient
|
t-value
|
Long-run multiplier coefficient
|
Coefficient
|
t-statistic
|
Long-run multiplier coefficient
|
|
EG
|
Intercept
|
1.52
|
5.02
|
-
|
2.07
|
5.07
|
-
|
|
EG-1
|
0.44*
|
1.97
|
-
|
0.51*
|
2.11
|
-
|
|
FT
|
-0.59*
|
-2.76
|
-2.43
|
-0.53*
|
-2.11
|
-2.13
|
|
FD
|
-0.55*
|
-2.53
|
-2.22
|
-0.50*
|
-2.06
|
-2.00
|
|
PC
|
0.66*
|
3.29
|
2.94
|
0.60*
|
3.02
|
2.50
|
|
HC
|
0.58*
|
2.72
|
2.38
|
0.54*
|
2.21
|
2.16
|
|
TR
|
0.49*
|
1.99
|
1.96
|
0.56*
|
2.42
|
2.27
|
|
PG
|
-0.29
|
-1.01
|
-1.40
|
-0.31
|
-1.04
|
-1.44
|
|
Wald test
|
3.92
|
4.33
|
|
(Critical p-value
= 0.05)
|
(0.009)
|
(0.006)
|
|
Hausman test (H0
= PMG, H1 = MG): t-statistic = 0.89, p-value = 0.13 (critical
p-value = 0.05).
|
* Significant at 5 %. Variables: EG = economic growth, FT = fiscal policy burden from total debt, FD = fiscal policy burden from component of total public debt, PC = physical capital,
HC = human capital, TR = trade, PG = population growth, EG-1 = lagged dependent variable. Source: Authors’ computer estimation.
|
Endogenous variable: EG
|
|
Exogenous variable
|
Total period
(1990-2022)
|
Sub-period 1
(1990-2007)
|
Sub-period 2
(2008-2022)
|
|
Coefficient
|
Asymptotic t-statistic
|
Coefficient
|
Asymptotic t-statistic
|
Coefficient
|
Asymptotic t-statistic
|
|
Intercept
|
0.28
|
1.18
|
0.32
|
1.20
|
0.30
|
1.15
|
|
FT
|
0.23
|
1.06
|
0.26
|
1.13
|
0.24
|
1.08
|
|
FD
|
0.24
|
1.08
|
0.25
|
1.12
|
0.21
|
1.01
|
|
PC
|
0.30
|
1.16
|
0.31
|
1.17
|
0.22
|
1.06
|
|
HC
|
0.29
|
1.14
|
0.29
|
1.19
|
0.32
|
1.20
|
|
TR
|
0.31
|
1.19
|
0.27
|
1.15
|
0.29
|
1.18
|
|
PG
|
0.25
|
1.11
|
0.30
|
1.16
|
0.27
|
1.16
|
|
EG-1
|
0.27
|
1.16
|
0.28
|
1.14
|
0.31
|
1.19
|
Variables: EG = economic growth, FT = fiscal policy burden from total debt, FD = fiscal policy
burden from domestic debt, PC = physical capital, HC = human capital, TR = trade, PG = population
growth, EG-1 = lagged dependent variable.
|
Alternative break point
|
Structural break
parameter estimate
|
Normalized bias
statistic
|
Standard
deviation (SD)
|
Root mean square
error (RMSE)
|
|
Rho 1
|
Rho 2
|
|
1997
|
0.05
|
0.06
|
0.31
|
0.15
|
0.22
|
|
1998
|
0.07
|
0.04
|
0.29
|
0.13
|
0.25
|
|
1999
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
0.32
|
0.11
|
0.27
|
|
2000
|
0.09
|
0.10
|
0.30
|
0.16
|
0.23
|
|
2001
|
0.08
|
0.07
|
0.34
|
0.14
|
0.20
|
|
2002
|
0.05
|
0.09
|
0.33
|
0.10
|
0.21
|
|
2003
|
0.11
|
0.08
|
0.36
|
0.12
|
0.24
|
Note: Alternative break points are distributed evenly around the year 2000.
Crossmark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref to provide a standard way for readers to locate the current version of a piece of content. By applying the Crossmark logo, the Institute of Public Finance is committing to maintaining the content it publishes and to alerting readers to changes if and when they occur. Clicking on the Crossmark logo will tell you the current status of a document and may also give you additional publication record information about the document.
|
|
March, 2025 I/2025
|