Public Sector Economics

1198
Views



178
Downloads

Going global, locally? Decentralized environmental expenditure and air quality



Sean Dougherty*
   
Andoni Montes Nebreda*
Article   |   Year:  2022   |   Pages:  489 - 503   |   Volume:  46   |   Issue:  4
Received:  May 24, 2022   |   Accepted:  June 28, 2022   |   Published online:  December 7, 2022
Download citation        https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.46.4.3       


  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A., 2005. Chapter 6 Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. In: Handbook of Economic Growth Volume 1A [CrossRef]

  2. Anderson, T. L. and Hill, P. J., 1996. Environmental federalism: thinking smaller. PERC Policy Series, No. PS-8.

  3. Arvin, M. B., Pradhan, R. P. and Nair, M. S., 2021. Are there links between institutional quality, government expenditure, tax revenue and economic growth? Evidence from low-income and lower middle-income countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 70, pp. 468-489 [CrossRef]

  4. Busch, J. [et al.], 2021. A global review of ecological fiscal transfers. Nature Sustainability, 4(9), pp. 756-765 [CrossRef]

  5. Butkiewicz, J. L. and Yanikkaya, H., 2011. Institutions and the impact of government spending on growth. Journal of Applied Economics, 14(2), pp. 319-341  [CrossRef]

  6. Cao, J., Wang, X. and Zhong, X., 2014. Did driving restrictions improve air quality in Beijing. China Economic Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 1091-1126.

  7. Charron, N., Lapuente, V. and Dijkstra, L., 2012. Regional governance matters: A study on regional variation in quality of government within the EU. Regional Studies, 48(1), pp. 68-90 [CrossRef]

  8. Copeland, B. R. and Taylor, M. S., 2004. Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic literature, 42(1), pp. 7-71.

  9. De Mello, L. and Martinez-Vazquez, J., 2022. Climate Change Implications for the Public Finances and Fiscal Policy: An Agenda for Future Research and Filling the Gaps in Scholarly Work. Economics, 16(1), pp. 194-198 [CrossRef]

  10. De Mello, L. and Jalles, T. J., 2022. Decentralisation and the environment: Survey-based and cross-country evidence. REM Working paper series, No. 0215 – 2022.

  11. EEA, 2021. Sources and emissions of air pollutants in Europe. Air quality in Europe 2021. Report No. 15/2021.

  12. Gilmore, E. A. and St. Clair, T., 2018. Budgeting for climate change: Obstacles and opportunities at the US state level. Climate policy, 18(6), pp. 729-741 [CrossRef]

  13. Guo, S. [et al.], 2020. Fiscal decentralization and local environmental pollution in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), p. 8661 [CrossRef]

  14. Harrison, K., 1996. Passing the Buck: Federalism and Canadian Environmental Policy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

  15. Hartman, R. and Kwon, O. S., 2005. Sustainable growth and the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 29(10), pp. 1701-1736 [CrossRef]

  16. He, L. [et al.], 2018. A study of the influence of regional environmental expenditure on air quality in China: the effectiveness of environmental policy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(8), pp. 7454-7468 [CrossRef]

  17. ITF, 2019. Benchmarking Accessibility in Cities: Measuring the Impact of Proximity and Transport Performance. International Transport Forum Policy Papers, No. 68.

  18. Jong, D. [et al.], 2021. A comprehensive approach to understanding urban productivity effects of local governments: Local autonomy, government quality and fragmentation. OECD Regional Development Papers, No. 11. [CrossRef]

  19. Liu, A. and Zhang, J., 2013. Fiscal decentralization and environmental infrastructure in China. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 13(2), pp. 733-759 [CrossRef]

  20. Liu, L., Ding, D. and He, J., 2019. Fiscal decentralization, economic growth, and haze pollution decoupling effects: a simple model and evidence from China. Computational Economics, 54(4), pp. 1423-1441 [CrossRef]

  21. Martinez-Vazquez, J., 2021. Adapting Fiscal Decentralization Design to Combat Climate Change. Washington: World Bank.

  22. Millimet, D. L., 2003. Assessing the empirical impact of environmental federalism. Journal of Regional Science, 43(4), pp. 711-733 [CrossRef]

  23. Nowak, D. J. [et al.], 2014. Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environmental pollution, 193, pp. 119-129 [CrossRef]

  24. Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E. and Stevens, J. C., 2006. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban forestry & urban greening, 4(3-4), pp. 115-123 [CrossRef]

  25. Oates, W.E., 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  26. OECD, 2019a. Making Decentralisation Work: A Handbook for Policy-Makers. Paris: OECD [CrossRef]

  27. OECD, 2019b. Financing climate objectives in cities and regions to deliver sustainable and inclusive growth. OECD Environment Policy Papers, No. 17. [CrossRef]

  28. OECD, 2020. A Territorial Approach to the Sustainable Development Goals: Synthesis report. Paris: OECD [CrossRef]

  29. OECD, 2021. Brick by Brick: Building Better Housing Policies. Paris: OECD [CrossRef]


  30. OECD, 2022b. Subnational Government Climate Expenditure and Revenue Tracking in OECD and EU countries. Paris: OECD. Forthcoming.


  31. Plouin, M. and Allain-Dupré, D., 2018. Financing climate objectives in cities and regions to deliver sustainable and inclusive growth. Financing Climate Futures. Paris: OECD.

  32. Qi, W., Huang, H. J. and Wang, S. W., 2015. Traffic restrictions effect on air quality: data integration analysis for Lanzhou City. In Stat Inf Forum, 30, pp. 74-81.

  33. Ring, I., 2002. Ecological public functions and fiscal equalisation at the local level in Germany. Ecological Economics, 42(3), pp. 415-427 [CrossRef]

  34. Rodriguez-Pose, A. and Garcilazo, E., 2013. Quality of Government and the Returns of Investment: Examining the Impact of Cohesion Expenditure in European Regions. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2013/12 [CrossRef]

  35. Scheberle, D., 1997. Federalism and Environmental Policy: Trust and the Politics of Implementation. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

  36. Smoke, P. and Cook, M., 2022. Administrative Decentralization and Climate Change. Washington: World Bank.

  37. Stigler, G. J., 1957. The tenable range of functions of local government. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, 88, pp. 3-9.

  38. WHO, 2018. Burden of disease from ambient air pollution for 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization.


  39. Xu Y. D., Zhang J. and Zhu J. M., 2015. The effect evaluation of the energy: saving emission reduction policies. Based Diff Chin Air Qual Index J Hei he Univ, 4, pp. 56-60.

  December, 2022
IV/2022
In order to give you a better user experience, cookies have been stored on your computer.
Accept cookie     More information