1953 Views
780 Downloads |
Measuring fiscal guidance transparency
Claudio Columbano*
Article | Year: 2022 | Pages: 261 - 296 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 2 Received: November 9, 2021 | Accepted: February 16, 2022 | Published online: June 1, 2022
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
|
Number of SCP
|
|
Country
|
Total
|
Original
|
Occasional
|
EU accession date
|
Austria
|
17
|
17
|
0
|
1/1/1995
|
Belgium
|
18
|
17
|
1
|
1/1/1957
|
Bulgaria
|
12
|
12
|
0
|
1/1/2007
|
Croatia
|
5
|
5
|
0
|
1/7/2013
|
Cyprus
|
12
|
11
|
1
|
1/5/2004
|
Czech Republic
|
15
|
15
|
0
|
1/5/2004
|
Denmark
|
17
|
17
|
0
|
1/1/1973
|
Estonia
|
15
|
15
|
0
|
1/5/2004
|
Finland
|
17
|
17
|
0
|
1/1/1995
|
France
|
17
|
17
|
0
|
1/1/1957
|
Germany
|
19
|
17
|
2
|
1/1/1957
|
Greece
|
11
|
10
|
1
|
1/1/1981
|
Hungary
|
16
|
15
|
1
|
1/5/2004
|
Ireland
|
18
|
17
|
1
|
1/1/1973
|
Italy
|
17
|
17
|
0
|
1/1/1957
|
Latvia
|
15
|
14
|
1
|
105/2004
|
Lithuania
|
15
|
15
|
0
|
1/5/2004
|
Luxembourg
|
18
|
17
|
1
|
1/1/1957
|
Malta
|
15
|
15
|
0
|
1/5/2004
|
Netherlands
|
19
|
16
|
3
|
1/1/1957
|
Poland
|
16
|
15
|
1
|
1/5/2004
|
Portugal
|
17
|
16
|
1
|
1/1/1986
|
Romania
|
12
|
12
|
0
|
1/1/2007
|
Slovakia
|
15
|
15
|
0
|
1/5/2004
|
Slovenia
|
15
|
15
|
0
|
1/5/2004
|
Spain
|
17
|
17
|
0
|
1/1/1986
|
Sweden
|
17
|
17
|
0
|
1/1/1995
|
UK
|
17
|
17
|
0
|
1/1/1973
|
Total
|
434
|
420
|
14
|
|
Note: This table reports the number of Stability/Convergence Programmes (SCP) published by the EU member states between 2001 and 2018. Columns 3 and 4 report the number of original and occasional SCPs, respectively. Column 5 lists the date of accession into the EU.
Country
|
Year
|
Description
|
Rationale
|
Belgium
|
2009
|
Restatement
|
Request from the Council of the EU
|
Cyprus
|
2009
|
Addendum with updated projections
|
Addendum following the EERP
|
Germany
|
2004
|
Revision
|
Revision following political
negotiations
|
Germany
|
2009
|
Addendum with updated projections
|
Addendum following the EERP
|
Greece
|
2005
|
Revision
|
Revision following concerns
related to budgetary statistics
|
Hungary
|
2006
|
Restatement
|
Request from the Council of the EU
|
Ireland
|
2009
|
Addendum with updated projections
|
Addendum following the EERP
|
Latvia
|
2009
|
Revision
|
Revision following economic
downturn
|
Luxembourg
|
2009
|
Addendum with updated projections
|
Addendum following the EERP
|
Netherlands
|
2003
|
Revision
|
Revision following political
negotiations
|
Netherlands
|
2008
|
Addendum with updated projections
|
Addendum following the EERP
|
Netherlands
|
2012
|
Restatement
|
Request from the Council of the EU
|
Poland
|
2008
|
Revision
|
Revision of the budgetary strategy
|
Portugal
|
2014
|
Voluntary Submission
|
Voluntary Submission of fiscal
strategy
|
Note: This table reports the rationale for the publication of the occasional SCPs that contain forecasts. In column 2 the year of publication of ad hoc SCPs is provided. Column 3 describes the nature of the occasional SCPs. Column 4 provides a brief indication of the rationale for the publication of the occasional SCP. EERP stands for European Economic Recovery Plan.
|
(1)
|
(2)
|
(3)
|
Constant
|
1.47
|
0.66
|
3.09***
|
[1.14]
|
[0.75]
|
[0.77]
|
R-squared
|
0.030
|
0.011
|
0.124
|
Observations
|
73
|
123
|
203
|
Cluster
|
Country
|
Country
|
Country
|
Note: This table reports the results of an intercept-only OLS regression that tests whether there are significant differences in the dates at which governments approve, submit, and publish their Stability/Convergence Programmes (SCP). Column 1 reports the difference between the publication date reported by the government and that reported by the press. Column 2 reports the difference between the date at which the government approves the SCP and the publication date. Column 3 reports the difference between the date at which the government submits the SCP to the European Commission and the publication date. Standard errors in brackets are clustered at the dimension indicated at the bottom of the table. + p < 0.10, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Year
|
N
|
Quarter
|
N
|
Month
|
N
|
Day
|
N
|
2001
|
14
|
1
|
61
|
1
|
36
|
Monday
|
60
|
2002
|
12
|
2
|
225
|
2
|
13
|
Tuesday
|
71
|
2003
|
17
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
12
|
Wednesday
|
100
|
2004
|
33
|
4
|
146
|
4
|
189
|
Thursday
|
109
|
2005
|
27
|
|
|
5
|
31
|
Friday
|
94
|
2006
|
27
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2007
|
31
|
|
|
7
|
0
|
|
|
2008
|
18
|
|
|
8
|
1
|
|
|
2009
|
18
|
|
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
2010
|
25
|
|
|
10
|
6
|
|
|
2011
|
27
|
|
|
11
|
58
|
|
|
2012
|
27
|
|
|
12
|
82
|
|
|
2013
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
434
|
Total
|
434
|
Total
|
434
|
Total
|
434
|
Note: This table shows the distribution of all Stability/Convergence Programmes (SCP) in the sample by year, quarter, month, and day of publication.
Category
|
#
|
Item name
|
N
|
Mean
|
St. dev.
|
Economic outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
Economic
outlook
|
1
|
Real
GDP
|
1674
|
0.97
|
0.16
|
2
|
Nominal
GDP
|
1674
|
0.94
|
0.24
|
3
|
GDP
deflator
|
1674
|
0.96
|
0.20
|
4
|
Private
consumption expenditure
|
1674
|
0.95
|
0.21
|
5
|
Government
consumption expenditure
|
1674
|
0.97
|
0.18
|
6
|
Gross
Fixed Capital Formation
|
1674
|
0.95
|
0.22
|
7
|
Inventory
and valuable
|
1674
|
0.93
|
0.26
|
8
|
Exports
|
1674
|
0.95
|
0.22
|
9
|
Imports
|
1674
|
0.95
|
0.22
|
10
|
Final
domestic demand
|
1674
|
0.95
|
0.22
|
11
|
External
balance
|
1674
|
0.96
|
0.20
|
12
|
Private
consumption deflator
|
1363
|
0.94
|
0.23
|
13
|
Public
consumption deflator
|
1363
|
0.88
|
0.33
|
14
|
Investment
deflator
|
1363
|
0.88
|
0.33
|
15
|
Export
deflator
|
1363
|
0.96
|
0.19
|
16
|
Import
deflator
|
1363
|
0.96
|
0.20
|
17
|
Harmonized
Consumer Price Inflation rate
|
311
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
18
|
Employment
growth
|
1674
|
0.94
|
0.24
|
19
|
Labour
productivity growth
|
1674
|
0.90
|
0.29
|
20
|
Employment
hours worked
|
1363
|
0.59
|
0.49
|
21
|
Unemployment
rate
|
1363
|
0.91
|
0.28
|
22
|
Labour
productivity per hour
|
1363
|
0.57
|
0.49
|
23
|
Compensation
of employees
|
1363
|
0.93
|
0.26
|
24
|
Compensation
per employee
|
931
|
0.93
|
0.25
|
25
|
Balance
of goods and services
|
1363
|
0.83
|
0.38
|
26
|
Balance
of income flows
|
1363
|
0.79
|
0.40
|
27
|
Capital
account
|
1363
|
0.72
|
0.45
|
28
|
Net
lending - Rest of the World
|
1363
|
0.83
|
0.37
|
29
|
Net
lending – Private sector
|
1363
|
0.69
|
0.46
|
30
|
Statistical
discrepancy
|
1363
|
0.36
|
0.48
|
31
|
Potential
GDP
|
1674
|
0.87
|
0.34
|
32
|
Output
gap
|
1674
|
0.93
|
0.25
|
33
|
Potential
GDP – labour
|
1363
|
0.68
|
0.47
|
34
|
Potential
GDP – capital
|
1363
|
0.68
|
0.47
|
35
|
Potential
GDP – productivity
|
1363
|
0.68
|
0.47
|
Fiscal outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
Fiscal
outlook
|
36
|
Net
lending – general government
|
1674
|
1.00
|
0.07
|
37
|
Net
lending – central government
|
1674
|
0.94
|
0.23
|
38
|
Net lending
– local governments
|
1674
|
0.90
|
0.30
|
39
|
Net
lending – social security funds
|
1674
|
0.88
|
0.33
|
40
|
Total
revenues
|
1674
|
0.97
|
0.17
|
41
|
Total
expenditures
|
1674
|
0.98
|
0.15
|
42
|
Net
interest payments
|
1674
|
0.97
|
0.17
|
43
|
Primary
balance
|
1674
|
0.99
|
0.09
|
44
|
Taxes
|
1674
|
0.90
|
0.30
|
45
|
Taxes
on production and imports
|
1363
|
0.95
|
0.21
|
46
|
Taxes
on income and wealth
|
1363
|
0.94
|
0.24
|
47
|
Capital
taxes
|
1363
|
0.90
|
0.30
|
48
|
Property
income
|
1363
|
0.92
|
0.27
|
49
|
p.m.
Tax burden
|
1363
|
0.91
|
0.28
|
50
|
Social
contributions
|
1674
|
0.94
|
0.24
|
51
|
Interest
income
|
311
|
0.44
|
0.50
|
52
|
Other
revenues
|
1674
|
0.93
|
0.25
|
53
|
Collective
consumption
|
743
|
0.50
|
0.50
|
54
|
Social
transfers. in kind
|
1674
|
0.78
|
0.42
|
55
|
Social
transfers. not in kind
|
1674
|
0.84
|
0.37
|
56
|
Interest
expenditure
|
311
|
0.96
|
0.20
|
57
|
p.m.
FISIM
|
432
|
0.21
|
0.41
|
58
|
Social
payments
|
1363
|
0.94
|
0.23
|
59
|
Of
which: unemployment benefits
|
636
|
0.75
|
0.43
|
60
|
Capital
transfers
|
636
|
0.86
|
0.35
|
61
|
Subsidies
|
1674
|
0.94
|
0.23
|
62
|
Government
Gross Fixed Capital Formation
|
1674
|
0.96
|
0.20
|
63
|
Compensation
of employees plus intermediate consumption
|
931
|
0.90
|
0.30
|
64
|
Compensation
of employees
|
931
|
0.90
|
0.31
|
65
|
Intermediate
consumption
|
931
|
0.90
|
0.31
|
66
|
p.m.
Government consumption
|
931
|
0.69
|
0.46
|
67
|
p.m.
Compensation of government employees
|
432
|
0.67
|
0.47
|
68
|
Other
expenditures
|
1674
|
0.93
|
0.26
|
69
|
Cyclical
budgetary component
|
1674
|
0.88
|
0.33
|
70
|
Cyclically
adjusted balance
|
1674
|
0.87
|
0.34
|
71
|
Cyclically
adjusted primary balance
|
1674
|
0.80
|
0.40
|
72
|
Cyclical
unemployment benefits
|
636
|
0.88
|
0.32
|
73
|
One-off
items
|
931
|
0.76
|
0.43
|
74
|
Of
which: one-off expenditure
|
108
|
0.41
|
0.49
|
75
|
Of
which: one-off revenue
|
108
|
0.41
|
0.49
|
76
|
Structural
balance
|
931
|
0.93
|
0.26
|
77
|
Total
revenues at unchanged policies
|
636
|
0.95
|
0.21
|
78
|
Total
expenditures at unchanged policies
|
636
|
0.75
|
0.43
|
79
|
Effect
of discretionary revenues
|
636
|
0.89
|
0.31
|
80
|
Revenue
increases mandated by law
|
636
|
0.54
|
0.50
|
81
|
Expenditures
on EU programmes
|
636
|
0.91
|
0.28
|
82
|
Of
which: investments on EU programmes
|
108
|
0.59
|
0.49
|
Debt outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
Debt
outlook
|
83
|
Gross
debt
|
1674
|
0.99
|
0.08
|
84
|
Change
in the debt ratio
|
1674
|
0.97
|
0.16
|
85
|
Percentage
of debt denominated in foreign currency
|
636
|
0.29
|
0.45
|
86
|
Average
debt maturity
|
636
|
0.15
|
0.36
|
87
|
Primary
balance
|
311
|
0.94
|
0.24
|
88
|
Nominal
GDP growth
|
311
|
0.91
|
0.28
|
89
|
p.m.
implicit interest
|
1674
|
0.91
|
0.29
|
90
|
Liquid financial
assets
|
1363
|
0.21
|
0.41
|
91
|
Net
financial debt
|
1363
|
0.21
|
0.40
|
92
|
Debt
amortization
|
636
|
0.33
|
0.47
|
93
|
Stock-flow
adjustments
|
1674
|
0.89
|
0.31
|
94
|
Of
which: privatization receipts
|
1674
|
0.33
|
0.47
|
95
|
Of
which: cash-accruals reconciliation
|
1363
|
0.32
|
0.47
|
96
|
Of
which: accumulation of financial assets
|
1363
|
0.34
|
0.47
|
97
|
Of
which: valuation effects
|
1363
|
0.29
|
0.45
|
98
|
Public
guarantees
|
636
|
0.10
|
0.30
|
99
|
Of
which: to financial sector
|
636
|
0.07
|
0.26
|
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
|
100
|
Short
term interest rates
|
1674
|
0.59
|
0.49
|
101
|
Long
term interest rates
|
1674
|
0.66
|
0.47
|
102
|
USA
Short term interest rates
|
311
|
0.15
|
0.36
|
103
|
USA
Long term interest rates
|
311
|
0.18
|
0.38
|
104
|
USD EUR
exchange rate
|
311
|
0.68
|
0.47
|
105
|
Effective
exchange rate: euro
|
311
|
0.10
|
0.30
|
106
|
Effective
exchange rate: EU
|
311
|
0.07
|
0.25
|
107
|
Exchange
rate – National Currency - Euro
|
311
|
0.27
|
0.45
|
108
|
Real
GDP: World
|
1674
|
0.67
|
0.47
|
109
|
Real
GDP: US
|
311
|
0.30
|
0.46
|
110
|
Real
GDP: Japan
|
311
|
0.24
|
0.43
|
111
|
Real
GDP: EU15
|
1674
|
0.70
|
0.46
|
112
|
Real
GDP: relevant markets
|
1674
|
0.65
|
0.48
|
113
|
Import
world volume
|
1674
|
0.55
|
0.50
|
114
|
Import
world prices
|
311
|
0.14
|
0.35
|
115
|
Commodity
prices
|
311
|
0.23
|
0.42
|
116
|
Oil
prices
|
1674
|
0.82
|
0.38
|
117
|
Effective
exchange rate
|
1363
|
0.59
|
0.49
|
Note: This table reports descriptive statistics of each item included in the dataset. The first column reports the category to which items are assigned. Column 2 includes the item number. Column 3 provides a short description of the item. Each item is coded as either present (1) or absent (0).
Note: This figure shows the average value of the FGT index for each country in the sample (panel A)
and for each year in the sample (panel B). FGT is defined in equation (1).
Variable
|
Mean
|
St. Dev.
|
FGT
|
78.12
|
15.87
|
Economic
outlook
|
85.42
|
19.00
|
Fiscal
outlook
|
87.31
|
16.69
|
Debt
outlook
|
54.93
|
25.11
|
Assumptions
|
61.82
|
34.37
|
Note: This table provides summary statistics of the FGT index and of the sub-indices of FGT that measure transparency in the release of forecast of coherent items. FGT is defined in equation (1). Minimum and maximum values are 0 and 100, respectively, for all variables. N=1674.
Panel A: Descriptive
statistics
Forecast horizon
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Dev.
|
Min
|
Max
|
0
|
434
|
79.96
|
13.91
|
6.32
|
100
|
1
|
434
|
79.19
|
14.73
|
6.32
|
100
|
2
|
434
|
77.22
|
16.80
|
0
|
100
|
3
|
372
|
75.78
|
17.74
|
0
|
100
|
Panel B: OLS results
|
(1)
|
|
FGT
|
Forecast Horizon t+k=1
|
-0.78***
|
[0.21]
|
Forecast Horizon t+k=2
|
-2.74**
|
[0.96]
|
Forecast Horizon t+k=3
|
-4.11***
|
[1.00]
|
Intercept (Forecast Horizon t+0)
|
65.25***
|
[2.99]
|
N
|
1674
|
Adj. R2
|
0.62
|
Country FE
|
Yes
|
Year FE
|
Yes
|
Cluster
|
Country & Date
|
Note: This table reports descriptive statistics of FGT by forecast horizon (Panel A) and the results of an OLS regression of FGT on country, year, and forecast horizon fixed effects (Panel B). Only the forecast horizon fixed effects are reported. The base level of the forecast horizon is the forecast for the current year t=0. Standard errors in brackets are clustered at the dimension indicated at the bottom of the table. FGT is defined in equation (1). + p < 0.10, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Variable
|
Description
|
Source
|
FGT
|
The number of non-missing items in
a SCP divided by the total number of SCP-specific required items.
|
Author's own elaboration on
primary data collected from Stability/Convergence Programmes (SCP). See
equation (1)
|
Government Strength
|
The percentage of seats in the
legislative chamber(s) that are occupied by members loyal to the incumbent
governing coalition
|
Database of Political Institutions
2021: variable name MAJ
|
Fragmentation of Parliament
|
The probability that two deputies
picked at random from the legislature belong to different political parties
|
Database of Political Institutions
2021: variable name FRAC
|
Electoral Pressure
|
Negative one times the number of
years left in the term of the government
|
Database of Political Institutions
2021: variable name YRCURNT
|
Democracy
|
The Polity 2 score
|
Polity IV database, variable polity2
|
GDP per capita
|
Natural logarithm of GDP per
capita in constant 2010 U.S. dollars
|
World Bank Development Indicators,
series NY.GDP.PCAP.KD
|
Debt
|
General Government Consolidated
Gross Debt, divided by GDP at current market prices
|
Eurostat, series gov_10dd_edpt1
|
Budget Balance
|
General Government Net Lending/Net
Borrowing, divided by GDP at current market prices
|
Eurostat, series gov_10dd_edpt1
|
Trade
|
The sum of exports and imports of
goods services, divided by GDP at current market prices
|
Eurostat, series nama10_gdp
|
EU Funds
|
EU payments to member states,
divided by GDP at current market prices
|
European Commission, DG Regional
Policy at:
https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/Other/Historic-EU-payments-regionalised-and-modelled/tc55-7ysv
|
Euro adopter
|
1 if the country is a member of
the euro area, 0 otherwise
|
European Central Bank
|
Note: This table presents the definition and source of variables used in the analysis.
Variables
|
(1)
|
(2)
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
(5)
|
(6)
|
(7)
|
(8)
|
(9)
|
(10)
|
(11)
|
(1) FGT
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Government Strength
|
-0.118
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Fragmentation of Parliament
|
0.157
|
-0.008
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
0.734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Electoral Pressure
|
-0.012
|
0.037
|
0.007
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.616
|
0.135
|
0.784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) Democracy
|
-0.128
|
-0.184
|
-0.224
|
0.022
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) GDP per capita
|
-0.314
|
-0.066
|
0.139
|
0.062
|
0.352
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
0.007
|
0.000
|
0.011
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) Debt
|
-0.033
|
0.001
|
-0.303
|
0.018
|
0.141
|
0.201
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
|
0.191
|
0.969
|
0.000
|
0.467
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8) Budget Balance
|
-0.038
|
0.045
|
0.304
|
0.064
|
-0.039
|
0.226
|
-0.430
|
1.000
|
|
|
|
0.136
|
0.078
|
0.000
|
0.011
|
0.127
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
|
(9) Trade
|
0.096
|
0.071
|
0.088
|
0.006
|
-0.016
|
0.162
|
-0.291
|
0.197
|
1.000
|
|
|
0.000
|
0.004
|
0.000
|
0.796
|
0.512
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
(10) EU Funds
|
0.265
|
0.096
|
-0.102
|
-0.033
|
-0.201
|
-0.587
|
-0.133
|
-0.187
|
0.071
|
1.000
|
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.195
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.005
|
|
|
(11) Euro adopter
|
0.134
|
-0.072
|
-0.003
|
-0.036
|
-0.188
|
-0.516
|
-0.413
|
0.034
|
-0.109
|
0.240
|
1.000
|
0.000
|
0.003
|
0.907
|
0.138
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.177
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
|
Note: This table presents pairwise correlations of the variables used in the analysis. Variables are defined in table 8.
|
(1)
|
(2)
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
Government strength
|
-0.42*
|
-0.16+
|
-0.42**
|
-0.16+
|
[0.15]
|
[0.08]
|
[0.15]
|
[0.08]
|
Fragmentation of parliament
|
0.31+
|
-0.35*
|
0.31+
|
-0.35*
|
[0.17]
|
[0.16]
|
[0.17]
|
[0.16]
|
Electoral pressure
|
0.44
|
0.30
|
0.44
|
0.30
|
[0.59]
|
[0.31]
|
[0.57]
|
[0.30]
|
Democracy
|
1.17
|
5.39
|
1.17
|
5.39+
|
[1.96]
|
[3.35]
|
[1.90]
|
[3.17]
|
GDP per capita
|
-10.92**
|
-8.77
|
-10.92**
|
-8.77
|
[3.92]
|
[9.89]
|
[3.82]
|
[9.24]
|
Debt
|
0.12+
|
-0.06
|
0.12+
|
-0.06
|
[0.06]
|
[0.08]
|
[0.06]
|
[0.08]
|
Budget balance
|
0.95+
|
0.28
|
0.95*
|
0.28
|
[0.47]
|
[0.22]
|
[0.46]
|
[0.21]
|
Trade
|
0.04
|
-0.04
|
0.04
|
-0.04
|
[0.03]
|
[0.05]
|
[0.03]
|
[0.04]
|
EU funds
|
0.66
|
-0.96
|
0.66
|
-0.96
|
[0.71]
|
[0.77]
|
[0.69]
|
[0.73]
|
Euro adopter
|
-1.36
|
3.54
|
-1.36
|
3.54
|
[5.23]
|
[2.72]
|
[5.07]
|
[2.77]
|
Constant
|
157.53***
|
147.29
|
157.53***
|
147.29
|
[40.26]
|
[108.15]
|
[39.34]
|
[102.85]
|
Adj. R2
|
0.31
|
0.64
|
0.31
|
0.64
|
Country FE
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Year FE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Horizon FE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Cluster
|
Country
|
Country
|
Country & Date
|
Country & Date
|
Note: This table reports estimates of OLS regressions of the FGT index on measures of economic wealth, financial pressures and political dynamics and fixed effects. All fixed effects are unreported for presentation purpose. Standard errors in brackets are clustered at the dimension indicated at the bottom of the table. Variables are defined in table 8. + p < 0.10, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Aaskoven, L, 2016. Fiscal transparency, elections and public employment: Evidence from the OECD. Economics & Politics, 28(3), pp. 317-341 [ CrossRef]
Alt, J. E. and Lassen, D. D., 2006. Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review, 50, pp. 1403-1439 [ CrossRef]
Alt, J. E. and Lowry, R. C., 1994. Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States. American Political Science Review, 88(4), pp. 811-828 [ CrossRef]
Alt, J. E., 2019. Twenty years of transparency research. Public Sector Economics, 43(1), pp. 5-13 [ CrossRef]
Alt, J. E., 2021. Keynote presentation on “Effects of fiscal transparency, participation and accountability on macro-fiscal, resource allocation, service delivery, governance, and development outcomes.” In: Public Sector Economics Conference 2021. Zagreb: Institute of Public Finance.
Alt, J. E., Lassen, D. D. and Wehner, J., 2014. It isn’t just about Greece: Domestic politics, transparency and fiscal gimmickry in Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 44(4), pp. 707-716 [ CrossRef]
Andersen, A. L., Lassen, D. D. and Nielsen, L. H. W., 2014. The impact of late budgets on state government borrowing costs. Journal of Public Economics, 109, pp. 27-35 [ CrossRef]
Angrist, J. D. and Pischke, J.-S., 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics : An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press [ CrossRef]
Arbatli, E. and Escolano, J., 2015. Fiscal Transparency, Fiscal Performance and Credit Ratings. Fiscal Studies, 36(2), pp. 237-270 [ CrossRef]
Bastida, F. and Benito, B., 2007. Central Government Budget Practices and Transparency: An International Comparison. Public Administration, 85(3), pp. 667-716 [ CrossRef]
Bastida, F., Guillamón, M. D. and Benito, B., 2017. Fiscal transparency and the cost of sovereign debt. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(1), pp. 106-128 [ CrossRef]
Benito, B. and Bastida, F., 2009. Budget Transparency, Fiscal Performance, and Political Turnout: An International Approach. Public Administration Review, 69(3), pp. 403-417 [ CrossRef]
Benito, B., Guillamón, M. D. and Bastida, F., 2016. The Impact of Transparency on the Cost of Sovereign Debt in Times of Economic Crisis. Financial Accountability & Management, 32(3), pp. 309-334 [ CrossRef]
Berliner, D., 2014. The political origins of transparency. Journal of Politics, 76(2), pp. 479-491 [ CrossRef]
Berliner, D., Bagozzi, B. E. and Palmer-Rubin, B., 2018. What information do citizens want? Evidence from one million information requests in Mexico. World Development, 109, pp. 222-235 [ CrossRef]
Cicatiello, L., De Simone, E. and Gaeta, G. L., 2017. Political determinants of fiscal transparency: a panel data empirical investigation. Economics of Governance, 18(4), pp. 315-336 [ CrossRef]
Citro, F., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. and Bisogno, M., 2021. Explaining budget transparency through political factors. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(1), pp. 115-134 [ CrossRef]
Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A. and Grimmelikhuijsen, S., 2017. 25 Years of Transparency Research: Evidence and Future Directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), pp. 32.44 [ CrossRef]
De Renzio, P. and Wehner, J., 2017. The Impacts of Fiscal Openness. The World Bank Research Observer, 32(2), pp. 185-210 [ CrossRef]
Edmonds, C. T. [et al.], 2017. Does timeliness of financial information matter in the governmental sector? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(2), pp. 163-176 [ CrossRef]
EU, 1997a. Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2.8.97 L 209/1.
EU, 1997b. Council Regulation (EC) No 1467/97 of 7 July 1997 on speeding up and clarifying the implementation of the excessive deficit procedure. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2.8.97 L 209/6.
EU, 1997c. Resolution of the European Council on the Stability and Growth Pact. Amsterdam, 17 June 1997. Official Journal of the European Communities, 2.8.97 C 236/1.
EU, 2005. Draft Council Conclusions on the Revised Code of Conduct Relating to the Stability and Growth Pact. 3 October 2005. 12822/05. Brussels.
EU, 2008. A European Economic Recovery Plan. Communication from the Commission to the European Council. 26.11.2008. COM(2008) 800 final. Brussels.
EU, 2009. Press Release 2967th Council meeting Economic and Financial Affairs. 20 October 2009. 14601/09 (Presse 294). Luxembourg.
Frankel, J. and Schreger, J., 2013. Over-optimistic official forecasts and fiscal rules in the eurozone. Review of World Economics, 149(2), pp. 247-272 [ CrossRef]
Fujiwara, I. and Waki, Y., 2020. Fiscal forward guidance: A case for selective transparency. Journal of Monetary Economics, 116, pp. 236-248 [ CrossRef]
Gulen, H. and Ion, M., 2016. Policy uncertainty and corporate investment. Review of Financial Studies, 29(3), pp. 523.564.
Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, B. P. and Vreeland, J. R., 2011. Democracy and transparency. Journal of Politics, 73(4), pp. 1191-1205 [ CrossRef]
Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, B. P. and Vreeland, J. R., 2014. Measuring Transparency. Political Analysis, 22, pp. 413-434 [ CrossRef]
Hood, C. and Heald, D. (eds.), 2006. Transparency : The Key to Better Governance? Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press for The British Academy.
IMF, 1998. Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency - Declaration on Principles. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp. 305-360 [ CrossRef]
Khagram, S., de Renzio, P. and Fung, A., 2013. Overview and synthesis: The political economy of fiscal transparency, participation, and accountability around the world. In: S. Khagram, A. Fung and P. de Renzio, eds. Open Budgets: The Political Economy of Transparency, Participation, and Accountability. Brookings Institution Press, p. 275.
Laffont, J.-J. and Tirole, J., 1992. Should governments commit? European Economic Review, 36, pp. 345-353 [ CrossRef]
Merola, R. and Pérez, J. J., 2013. Fiscal forecast errors: Governments versus independent agencies? European Journal of Political Economy, 32, pp. 285-299 [ CrossRef]
Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., 2004. Good, bad or ugly? On the effects of fiscal rules with creative accounting. Journal of Public Economics, 88(1-2), pp. 377-394 [ CrossRef]
Mosley, L., Paniagua, V. and Wibbels, E., 2020. Moving markets? Government bond investors and microeconomic policy changes. Economics & Politics, 32(2), pp. 197-249 [ CrossRef]
OECD, 2002. OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1(3), pp. 7-14 [ CrossRef]
Paredes, J., Pérez, J. J. and Perez-Quiros, G., 2015. Fiscal targets. A guide to forecasters? E uropean Central Bank Working Paper Series, No 1834 [ CrossRef]
Pástor, L. and Veronesi, P., 2012. Uncertainty about Government Policy and Stock Prices. T he Journal of Finance, 67(4), pp. 1219-1264 [ CrossRef]
Pollitt, C. and Hupe, P., 2011. Talking About Government : The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 13(5), pp. 641-658 [ CrossRef]
Ríos, A. M., Bastida, F. and Benito, B., 2016. Budget Transparency and Legislative Budgetary Oversight: An International Approach. American Review of Public Administration, 46(5), pp. 546.568 [ CrossRef]
Savage, J. D., 2005. Making the EMU : The Politics of Budgetary Surveillance and the Enforcement of Maastricht. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wang, R., Irwin, T. and Murara, L., 2015. Trends in Fiscal Transparency: Evidence from a New Database of the Coverage of Fiscal Reporting. IMF Working Paper, WP/15/188 [ CrossRef]
Wehner, J. and de Renzio, P., 2013. Citizens, legislators, and executive disclosure: The political determinants of fiscal transparency. World Development, 41(1), pp. 96-108 [ CrossRef]
Williams, A., 2015. A global index of information transparency and accountability. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(3), pp. 804-824 [ CrossRef]
World Bank, 1992. Governance and Development. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
|
|
June, 2022 II/2022
|