8973 Views
1010 Downloads |
The impact of tax structure on investment: an empirical assessment for OECD countries*
José Alves*
José Alves
Affiliation: ISEG/UL – Universidade de Lisboa, Department of Economics, Lisboa, Portugal ; REM – Research in Economics and Mathematics, UECE – Research Unit on Complexity and Economics (UECE is supported by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal), Lisboa, Portugal
0000-0002-9979-7544
Correspondence
jalves@iseg.ulisboa.pt
Article | Year: 2019 | Pages: 291 - 309 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 3 Received: July 8, 2019 | Accepted: July 26, 2019 | Published online: September 14, 2019
|
FULL ARTICLE
FIGURES & DATA
REFERENCES
CROSSMARK POLICY
METRICS
LICENCING
PDF
|
realgdppc
|
taxinc
|
taxfirms
|
ssc
|
taxpayroll
|
taxprop
|
Mean
|
24.448
|
8.82
|
2.806
|
8.345
|
0.369
|
1.745
|
Std.
dev.
|
14.313
|
4.635
|
1.500
|
4.981
|
0.728
|
1.003
|
Max
|
101.054
|
26.78
|
12.594
|
19.173
|
5.661
|
7.334
|
Min
|
2.184
|
0.873
|
0.261
|
0.000
|
0.000
|
0.074
|
Obs.
|
1195
|
1106
|
1106
|
1137
|
1137
|
1137
|
|
taxvat
|
gfcf
|
gfcfgr
|
depositrate
|
ageratio
|
debt
|
Mean
|
10.588
|
23.161
|
3.314
|
9.253
|
51.287
|
55.728
|
Std.
dev.
|
3.046
|
4.091
|
8.917
|
25.364
|
6.931
|
35.901
|
Max
|
18.73
|
39.404
|
45.119
|
682.53
|
96.457
|
242.113
|
Min
|
2.979
|
11.546
|
-47.761
|
-0.18
|
36.323
|
3.664
|
Obs.
|
1137
|
1174
|
1164
|
1055
|
1260
|
943
|
|
foreigninvestment
|
rtfpna
|
totexp
|
pop
|
hconsggdp
|
outputgap
|
Mean
|
3.645
|
0.941
|
42.621
|
33.531
|
56.382
|
-0.319
|
Std.
dev.
|
10.487
|
0.123
|
9.657
|
52.235
|
7.069
|
2.850
|
Max
|
252.308
|
1.539
|
68.436
|
319.449
|
79.551
|
14.911
|
Min
|
-58.323
|
0.472
|
14.244
|
0.228
|
29.918
|
-11.437
|
Obs.
|
1120
|
1173
|
977
|
1173
|
1174
|
851
|
|
OLS
|
OLS-FE
|
GMM
|
RLS
|
|
(1)
|
(2)
|
(3)
|
(4)
|
(5)
|
(6)
|
(7)
|
(8)
|
Δrealgdppc
|
0.004***
|
0.003***
|
0.003***
|
0.003***
|
0.004***
|
0.005***
|
0.004***
|
0.004***
|
|
(0.000)
|
(0.000)
|
(0.001)
|
(0.001)
|
(0.001)
|
(0.001)
|
(0.000)
|
(0.000)
|
taxinc-1
|
-0.144**
|
-0.069
|
0.131
|
1.491**
|
-0.127
|
0.037
|
-0.128**
|
-0.182
|
|
(0.070)
|
(0.215)
|
(0.199)
|
(0.577)
|
(0.112)
|
(0.367)
|
(0.061)
|
(0.175)
|
taxinc2-1
|
|
-0.007
|
|
-0.070**
|
|
-0.015
|
|
-0.001
|
|
|
(0.009)
|
|
(0.031)
|
|
(0.017)
|
|
(0.008)
|
taxfirms-1
|
-0.442**
|
-1.580***
|
0.277
|
-0.595
|
-0.561***
|
-3.859***
|
-0.289**
|
-1.032**
|
|
(0.176)
|
(0.568)
|
(0.272)
|
(0.779)
|
(0.263)
|
(1.488)
|
(0.140)
|
(0.427)
|
taxfirms2-1
|
|
0.107**
|
|
0.070
|
|
0.279**
|
|
0.066*
|
|
|
(0.044)
|
|
(0.060)
|
|
(0.115)
|
|
(0.039)
|
ssc-1
|
-0.121**
|
-0.436**
|
-0.047
|
-2.007**
|
-0.151
|
-0.703
|
-0.086*
|
-0.276
|
|
(0.058)
|
(0.209)
|
(0.230)
|
(1.013)
|
(0.095)
|
(0.437)
|
(0.050)
|
(0.180)
|
ssc2-1
|
|
0.017
|
|
0.083**
|
|
0.028
|
|
0.010
|
|
|
(0.011)
|
|
(0.039)
|
|
(0.021)
|
|
(0.010)
|
taxpayroll-1
|
-0.324
|
0.420
|
1.990**
|
3.002
|
-0.065
|
-2.013
|
-0.284
|
0.107
|
|
(0.262)
|
(0.929)
|
(0.968)
|
(1.904)
|
(0.381)
|
(1.546)
|
(0.277)
|
(0.934)
|
taxpayroll2-1
|
|
-0.365
|
|
-0.304
|
|
0.729
|
|
-0.144
|
|
|
(0.356)
|
|
(0.540)
|
|
(0.682)
|
|
(0.383)
|
taxprop-1
|
-0.571*
|
-0.588
|
-0.211
|
0.775
|
-0.036
|
3.822
|
-0.013
|
1.139
|
|
(0.295)
|
(1.025)
|
(0.508)
|
(1.521)
|
(0.649)
|
(2.793)
|
(0.255)
|
(0.770)
|
taxprop2-1
|
|
0.042
|
|
-0.118
|
|
-0.658
|
|
-0.208
|
|
|
(0.166)
|
|
(0.214)
|
|
(0.443)
|
|
(0.141)
|
taxvat-1
|
-0.612***
|
-2.640***
|
0.413
|
0.291
|
-0.103
|
-2.691*
|
-0.663***
|
-1.982***
|
|
(0.163)
|
(0.635)
|
(0.363)
|
(1.127)
|
(0.3)
|
(1.519)
|
(0.133)
|
(0.538)
|
taxvat2-1
|
|
0.099***
|
|
0.016
|
|
0.111
|
|
0.066**
|
|
|
(0.033)
|
|
(0.057)
|
|
(0.072)
|
|
(0.026)
|
gfcf-1
|
-0.521***
|
-0.615***
|
-1.283***
|
-1.337***
|
-0.077
|
-0.340
|
-0.505***
|
-0.599***
|
|
(0.104)
|
(0.123)
|
(0.148)
|
(0.159)
|
(0.111)
|
(0.208)
|
(0.072)
|
(0.079)
|
gfcfgr-1
|
0.242***
|
0.242***
|
0.225***
|
0.221***
|
0.429**
|
0.267
|
0.259***
|
0.257***
|
|
(0.057)
|
(0.058)
|
(0.061)
|
(0.061)
|
(0.183)
|
(0.169)
|
(0.032)
|
(0.032)
|
Δdepositrate
|
-0.426*
|
-0.435*
|
-0.436*
|
-0.414*
|
1.063
|
-1.323
|
-0.583***
|
-0.606***
|
|
(0.241)
|
(0.238)
|
(0.256)
|
(0.251)
|
(1.233)
|
(1.526)
|
(0.160)
|
(0.159)
|
ageratio-1
|
-0.016
|
-0.053
|
-0.065
|
-0.029
|
-0.044
|
-0.029
|
-0.027
|
-0.058
|
|
(0.067)
|
(0.071)
|
(0.137)
|
(0.144)
|
(0.116)
|
(0.104)
|
(0.053)
|
(0.055)
|
Δdebt
|
-0.275***
|
-0.303***
|
-0.189**
|
-0.200**
|
-0.487*
|
-0.543**
|
-0.264***
|
-0.295***
|
|
(0.078)
|
(0.082)
|
(0.082)
|
(0.084)
|
(0.258)
|
(0.218)
|
(0.047)
|
(0.047)
|
rtfpna
|
-12.705***
|
-12.809***
|
-6.562
|
-2.947
|
2.829
|
-0.873
|
-10.328***
|
-10.345***
|
|
(3.769)
|
(3.884)
|
(5.536)
|
(6.308)
|
(4.246)
|
(5.567)
|
(2.677)
|
(2.770)
|
Δtotexp-1
|
-0.148
|
-0.160
|
-0.088
|
-0.081
|
0.315
|
-0.139
|
0.053
|
0.032
|
|
(0.159)
|
(0.163)
|
(0.154)
|
(0.157)
|
(0.654)
|
(0.602)
|
(0.104)
|
(0.104)
|
log(pop)
|
-0.497
|
-0.580
|
61.785***
|
63.702***
|
0.228
|
-0.501
|
-0.926***
|
-0.997***
|
|
(0.397)
|
(0.396)
|
(10.841)
|
(11.771)
|
(0.878)
|
(0.974)
|
(0.237)
|
(0.243)
|
foreigninvestment-1
|
-0.075***
|
-0.066***
|
-0.070***
|
-0.066***
|
0.028
|
0.009
|
-0.075***
|
-0.073***
|
|
(0.017)
|
(0.016)
|
(0.017)
|
(0.017)
|
(0.087)
|
(0.091)
|
(0.015)
|
(0.015)
|
hconsumption-1
|
0.039
|
0.013
|
-0.214**
|
-0.242**
|
0.07
|
0.000
|
0.036
|
0.024
|
|
(0.027)
|
(0.028)
|
(0.093)
|
(0.094)
|
(0.048)
|
(0.049)
|
(0.027)
|
(0.028)
|
outputgap
|
0.369**
|
0.466***
|
0.690***
|
0.736***
|
-0.849**
|
0.121
|
0.271***
|
0.352***
|
|
(0.157)
|
(0.157)
|
(0.159)
|
(0.170)
|
(0.395)
|
(0.565)
|
(0.091)
|
(0.093)
|
Tax thresholds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
taxinc
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
10.65%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
taxfirms
|
-
|
7.38%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6.92%
|
-
|
7.82%
|
ssc
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12.09%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
taxpayroll
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
taxprop
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
taxvat
|
-
|
13.33%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
15.02%
|
R2
|
0.540
|
0.554
|
0.680
|
0.687
|
0.343
|
0.477
|
0.401
|
0.414
|
DW-Stat
|
1.856
|
1.875
|
2.000
|
2.018
|
2.110
|
1.949
|
n.a.
|
n.a.
|
Obs.
|
529
|
529
|
529
|
529
|
473
|
473
|
529
|
529
|
Notes: *, ** and *** represent statistical significance at levels of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively. The robust standard errors are in brackets. The White diagonal covariance matrix is used in order to assume residual heteroskedasticity, with the exception of the RLS technique. The DW-statistic is the Durbin-Watson statistic. The non-bold and bold values express, respectively, maximum and minimum levels of optimal tax items.
|
OLS
|
OLS-FE
|
GMM
|
RLS
|
|
(9)
|
(10)
|
(11)
|
(12)
|
(13)
|
(14)
|
(15)
|
(16)
|
Δrealgdppc
|
0.000**
|
0.000**
|
0.003***
|
0.001**
|
0.004***
|
0.001**
|
0.004***
|
0.000*
|
|
(0.000)
|
(0.000)
|
(0.001)
|
(0.000)
|
(0.001)
|
(0.000)
|
(0.000)
|
(0.000)
|
taxinc-1
|
-0.042
|
-0.085
|
0.131
|
0.740
|
-0.127
|
-0.263
|
-0.128**
|
0.021
|
|
(0.051)
|
(0.091)
|
(0.199)
|
(0.571)
|
(0.112)
|
(0.169)
|
(0.061)
|
(0.114)
|
taxinc2-1
|
|
0.003
|
|
-0.042
|
|
0.012*
|
|
-0.004
|
|
|
(0.004)
|
|
(0.029)
|
|
(0.007)
|
|
(0.005)
|
taxfirms-1
|
-0.098
|
-0.197
|
0.277
|
0.489
|
-0.561**
|
-0.601
|
-0.289**
|
-0.828***
|
|
(0.107)
|
(0.458)
|
(0.272)
|
(0.747)
|
(0.263)
|
(0.734)
|
(0.140)
|
(0.278)
|
taxfirms2-1
|
|
0.014
|
|
-0.028
|
|
0.041
|
|
0.066***
|
|
|
(0.034)
|
|
(0.053)
|
|
(0.055)
|
|
(0.025)
|
ssc-1
|
-0.069**
|
-0.227**
|
-0.047
|
-0.417
|
-0.151
|
-0.150
|
-0.086*
|
-0.255**
|
|
(0.034)
|
(0.091)
|
(0.230)
|
(0.662)
|
(0.095)
|
(0.172)
|
(0.050)
|
(0.117)
|
ssc2-1
|
|
0.010*
|
|
0.008
|
|
0.006
|
|
0.009
|
|
|
(0.005)
|
|
(0.023)
|
|
(0.010)
|
|
(0.006)
|
taxpayroll-1
|
-0.168
|
0.170
|
1.990**
|
1.156
|
-0.065
|
0.221
|
-0.284
|
-0.164
|
|
(0.160)
|
(0.490)
|
(0.968)
|
(1.352)
|
(0.381)
|
(0.986)
|
(0.277)
|
(0.608)
|
taxpayroll2-1
|
|
-0.215
|
|
-0.467
|
|
-0.334
|
|
-0.044
|
|
|
(0.185)
|
|
(0.503)
|
|
(0.415)
|
|
(0.249)
|
taxprop-1
|
-0.258
|
-0.971
|
-0.211
|
-0.816
|
-0.036
|
-1.381
|
-0.013
|
0.447
|
|
(0.181)
|
(0.868)
|
(0.508)
|
(1.838)
|
(0.649)
|
(1.260)
|
(0.255)
|
(0.501)
|
taxprop2-1
|
|
0.137
|
|
0.122
|
|
0.190
|
|
-0.052
|
|
|
(0.124)
|
|
(0.219)
|
|
(0.198)
|
|
(0.092)
|
taxvat-1
|
-0.271**
|
-0.183
|
0.413
|
1.985***
|
-0.103
|
0.298
|
-0.663***
|
-0.499
|
|
(0.109)
|
(0.397)
|
(0.363)
|
(0.571)
|
(0.300)
|
(0.853)
|
(0.133)
|
(0.350)
|
taxvat2-1
|
|
-0.007
|
|
-0.108***
|
|
-0.040
|
|
0.022
|
|
|
(0.021)
|
|
(0.029)
|
|
(0.035)
|
|
(0.017)
|
gfcf-1
|
-0.114*
|
-0.100
|
-1.283***
|
-0.259***
|
-0.077
|
0.096
|
-0.505***
|
-0.083
|
|
(0.062)
|
(0.069)
|
(0.148)
|
(0.091)
|
(0.111)
|
(0.115)
|
(0.072)
|
(0.052)
|
gfcfgr-1
|
0.274***
|
0.267***
|
0.225***
|
0.214***
|
0.429**
|
0.265***
|
0.259***
|
0.292***
|
|
(0.034)
|
(0.036)
|
(0.061)
|
(0.036)
|
(0.183)
|
(0.100)
|
(0.032)
|
(0.021)
|
Δdepositrate
|
-0.648***
|
-0.644***
|
-0.436*
|
-0.468***
|
1.063
|
-0.388
|
-0.583***
|
-0.573***
|
|
(0.124)
|
(0.191)
|
(0.256)
|
(0.131)
|
(1.233)
|
(0.815)
|
(0.160)
|
(0.104)
|
ageratio-1
|
-0.064
|
-0.053
|
-0.065
|
-0.052
|
-0.044
|
0.089**
|
-0.027
|
-0.071**
|
|
(0.040)
|
(0.032)
|
(0.137)
|
(0.112)
|
(0.116)
|
(0.045)
|
(0.053)
|
(0.036)
|
Δdebt
|
-0.239***
|
-0.238***
|
-0.189**
|
-0.150***
|
-0.487*
|
-0.631***
|
-0.264***
|
-0.245***
|
|
(0.050)
|
(0.057)
|
(0.082)
|
(0.041)
|
(0.258)
|
(0.124)
|
(0.047)
|
(0.031)
|
rtfpna
|
-4.849**
|
-4.240*
|
-6.562
|
0.082
|
2.829
|
1.089
|
-10.328***
|
-4.070**
|
|
(2.074)
|
(2.551)
|
(5.536)
|
(4.644)
|
(4.246)
|
(3.229)
|
(2.677)
|
(1.803)
|
Δtotexp-1
|
-0.046
|
-0.050
|
-0.088
|
0.002
|
0.315
|
0.517
|
0.053
|
-0.125*
|
|
(0.091)
|
(0.077)
|
(0.154)
|
(0.079)
|
(0.654)
|
(0.327)
|
(0.104)
|
(0.068)
|
log(pop)
|
-0.436**
|
-0.421
|
61.785***
|
14.650**
|
0.228
|
-0.203
|
-0.926***
|
-0.415***
|
|
(0.189)
|
(0.299)
|
(10.841)
|
(7.225)
|
(0.878)
|
(0.391)
|
(0.237)
|
(0.158)
|
foreigninvestment-1
|
-0.004
|
-0.002
|
-0.070***
|
-0.006
|
0.028
|
0.044
|
-0.075***
|
-0.003
|
|
(0.007)
|
(0.006)
|
(0.017)
|
(0.009)
|
(0.087)
|
(0.047)
|
(0.015)
|
(0.010)
|
hconsumption-1
|
0.056***
|
0.053***
|
-0.214**
|
-0.093
|
0.070
|
0.057**
|
0.036
|
0.026
|
|
(0.018)
|
(0.018)
|
(0.093)
|
(0.102)
|
(0.048)
|
(0.028)
|
(0.027)
|
(0.018)
|
outputgap
|
-0.144*
|
-0.138
|
0.690***
|
-0.085
|
-0.849**
|
-0.433
|
0.271***
|
-0.214***
|
|
(0.083)
|
(0.103)
|
(0.159)
|
(0.091)
|
(0.395)
|
(0.312)
|
(0.091)
|
(0.061)
|
Tax
thresholds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
taxinc
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
taxfirms
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6.27%
|
ssc
|
-
|
11.35%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
taxpayroll
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
taxprop
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
taxvat
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9.19%
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
R2
|
0.476
|
0.481
|
0.717
|
0.730
|
0.171
|
0.180
|
0.360
|
0.366
|
DW-Stat
|
1.124
|
1.127
|
1.034
|
1.095
|
1.692
|
1.665
|
n.a.
|
n.a.
|
Obs.
|
529
|
529
|
529
|
529
|
473
|
473
|
529
|
529
|
Notes: *, ** and *** represent statistical significance at levels of 10%, 5%, and 1% respectively. The robust standard errors are in brackets. The White diagonal covariance matrix is used in order to assume residual heteroskedasticity, with the exception of the RLS technique. The DW-statistic is the Durbin-Watson statistic. The non-bold and bold values express, respectively, maximum and minimum levels of optimal tax items.
|
Short-run
|
Long-run
|
Mean
|
taxinc
|
10.65%
|
-
|
8.82%
|
taxfirms
|
7.37%
|
6.27%
|
2.81%
|
ssc
|
12.09%
|
11.35%
|
8.35%
|
taxpayroll
|
-
|
-
|
0.37%
|
taxprop
|
-
|
-
|
1.75%
|
taxvat
|
14.18%
|
9.19%
|
10.59%
|
Notes: The non-bold and bold values, presented in the short-run and long-run columns express maximum and minimum optimum levels, respectively. The values expressed in italics represent average values.
Afonso, A. and Jalles, J. T., 2015. How Does Fiscal Policy Affect Investment? Evidence from a Large Panel. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 4, pp. 310-327 [ CrossRef]
Afonso, A. and St. Aubyn, M., 2009. Macroeconomic Rates of Return of Public and Private Investment: Crowding-in and Crowding-out Effects. The Manchester School, 77(s1), pp. 21-39 [ CrossRef]
Alesina, A. and Ardagna, S., 2010. 2 Large Changes in Fiscal Policy: Taxes versus Spending. Tax Policy and the Economy, 24(1), pp. 35-68 [ CrossRef]
Arnold, J., 2008. Do Tax Structures Affect Aggregate Economic Growth? Empirical Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 643 [ CrossRef]
Baliamoune-Lutz, M. and Garello, P., 2014. Tax structure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 42(1), pp. 165-190 [ CrossRef]
Barro, R. J. and Redlick, C. J., 2011. Macroeconomic Effects From Government Purchases and Taxes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), pp. 51-102 [ CrossRef]
Bond, S. and Xing, J., 2015. Corporate taxation and capital accumulation: Evidence from sectoral panel data for 14 OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 130(Supplement C), pp. 15-31 [ CrossRef]
Brandstetter, L. and Jacob, M., 2013. Do corporate tax cuts increase investments? Berlin: Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre [ CrossRef]
Braunerhjelm, P. and Eklund, J., 2014. Taxes, tax administrative burdens and new firm formation. Kyklos, 67(1), pp. 1-11 [ CrossRef]
Cass, D., 1965. Optimum Growth in an Aggregative Model of Capital Accumulation. The Review of Economic Studies, 32(3), pp. 233-240 [ CrossRef]
Da Rin, M., Di Giacomo, M. and Sembenelli, A., 2011. Entrepreneurship, firm entry, and the taxation of corporate income: Evidence from Europe. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), pp. 1048-1066 [ CrossRef]
Da Rin, M., Sembenelli, A. and Di Giacomo, M., 2010. Corporate Taxation and the Size of New Firms: Evidence from Europe. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(2-3), pp. 606-616 [ CrossRef]
Djankov, S. [et al.], 2010. The Effect of Corporate Taxes on Investment and Entrepreneurship. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(3), pp. 31-64 [ CrossRef]
Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R. and Timmer, M. P., 2015. The Next Generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10), pp. 3150-3182 [ CrossRef]
Galindo, A. J., and Pombo, C., 2011. Corporate taxation, investment and productivity: A firm level estimation. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 5(7), 158-161.
Gemmell, N. [et al.], 2016. Corporate Taxation and Productivity Catch-Up: Evidence from European Firms. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 120(2), pp. 372-399 [ CrossRef]
Grdinic, M., Drezgic, S. and Blazic, H., 2017. An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Tax Structures and Economic Growth in CEE Countries. Ekonomický časopis, pp. 426-447.
Jacob, M., Michaely, R. and Müller, M. A., 2017. Consumption Taxes and Corporate Investment. The Review of Financial Studies, pp. 1-39 [ CrossRef]
Koopmans, T., 1963. On the Concept of Optimal Economic Growth. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
Langenmayr, D., Haufler, A. and Bauer, C. J., 2015. Should tax policy favor high- or low-productivity firms? European Economic Review, 73(Supplement C), pp. 18-34 [ CrossRef]
Lee, Y. and Gordon, R. H., 2005. Tax structure and economic growth. J ournal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), pp. 1027-1043 [ CrossRef]
Ljungqvist, A. and Smolyansky, M., 2016. To Cut or Not to Cut? On the Impact of Corporate Taxes on Employment and Income. Massachussets: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Ljungqvist, A., Zhang, L. and Zuo, L., 2017. Sharing Risk with the Government: How Taxes Affect Corporate Risk Taking. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(3), pp. 669-707 [ CrossRef]
Mertens, K. and Ravn, M. O., 2012. Empirical Evidence on the Aggregate Effects of Anticipated and Unanticipated US Tax Policy Shocks. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(2), pp. 145-181 [ CrossRef]
Mountford, A. and Uhlig, H., 2009. What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(6), pp. 960-992 [ CrossRef]
Mukherjee, A., Singh, M. and Žaldokas, A., 2017. Do corporate taxes hinder innovation? Journal of Financial Economics, 124(1), pp. 195-221 [ CrossRef]
Ramsey, F., 1928. A Mathematical Theory of Saving. The Economic Journal, 38(152), pp. 543-559 [ CrossRef]
Romer, C. D. and Romer, D. H., 2010. The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks. American Economic Review, 100(3), pp. 763-801 [ CrossRef]
Solow, R., 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), pp. 65-94 [ CrossRef]
Swan, T., 1956. Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation. Economic Record, 32(2), pp. 334-361 [ CrossRef]
Vergara, R., 2010. Taxation and private investment: evidence for Chile. Applied Economics, 42(6), pp. 717-725 [ CrossRef]
|
|
September, 2019 III/2019
|